PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FKRCX vs. SHAPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FKRCX vs. SHAPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Fund (FKRCX) and ClearBridge Appreciation Fund (SHAPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FKRCX achieves a 6.83% return, which is significantly higher than SHAPX's 6.04% return. Over the past 10 years, FKRCX has outperformed SHAPX with an annualized return of 15.96%, while SHAPX has yielded a comparatively lower 13.25% annualized return.


FKRCX

1D
1.17%
1M
2.22%
YTD
6.83%
6M
19.04%
1Y
85.44%
3Y*
53.81%
5Y*
21.74%
10Y*
15.96%

SHAPX

1D
-0.05%
1M
2.33%
YTD
6.04%
6M
5.66%
1Y
17.56%
3Y*
17.64%
5Y*
11.44%
10Y*
13.25%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FKRCX vs. SHAPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FKRCX
Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Fund
6.83%196.59%17.64%2.03%-23.47%-4.03%44.30%51.48%-18.11%-0.12%
SHAPX
ClearBridge Appreciation Fund
6.04%14.32%22.37%19.50%-12.56%23.52%14.53%29.84%-2.19%18.31%

Correlation

The correlation between FKRCX and SHAPX is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.33

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.30

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.34

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.25

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 1990

0.22

The correlation between FKRCX and SHAPX shifts across timeframes, from 0.22 (all time) to 0.34 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FKRCX vs. SHAPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FKRCX
FKRCX Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
FKRCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FKRCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
FKRCX Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
FKRCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
FKRCX Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

SHAPX
SHAPX Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
SHAPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SHAPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
SHAPX Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
SHAPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
SHAPX Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FKRCX vs. SHAPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Fund (FKRCX) and ClearBridge Appreciation Fund (SHAPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FKRCXSHAPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.32

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.82

2.07

+0.74

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.91

9.48

-1.57

FKRCX vs. SHAPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FKRCX Sharpe Ratio is 2.09, which is comparable to the SHAPX Sharpe Ratio of 1.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FKRCX and SHAPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FKRCXSHAPXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.09

1.73

+0.35

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

0.77

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

0.79

-0.31

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.19

0.79

-0.60

Drawdowns

FKRCX vs. SHAPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FKRCX drawdown since its inception was -78.85%, which is greater than SHAPX's maximum drawdown of -46.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FKRCX and SHAPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FKRCXSHAPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-78.85%

-46.19%

-32.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-31.15%

-8.74%

-22.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-31.15%

-16.15%

-15.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-48.79%

-20.53%

-28.26%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-49.54%

-32.21%

-17.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-20.60%

-0.49%

-20.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-33.74%

-4.78%

-28.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.07%

1.91%

+9.16%

Volatility

FKRCX vs. SHAPX - Volatility Comparison

Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Fund (FKRCX) has a higher volatility of 13.60% compared to ClearBridge Appreciation Fund (SHAPX) at 2.46%. This indicates that FKRCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SHAPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FKRCXSHAPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.60%

2.46%

+11.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

35.14%

7.90%

+27.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

42.21%

10.46%

+31.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

33.82%

14.86%

+18.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.85%

16.73%

+16.12%

FKRCX vs. SHAPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FKRCX has a 0.88% expense ratio, which is lower than SHAPX's 0.93% expense ratio.


Dividends

FKRCX vs. SHAPX - Dividend Comparison

FKRCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.06%, less than SHAPX's 13.27% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FKRCX
Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Fund
10.06%10.75%13.44%3.12%0.00%9.37%10.55%0.00%0.00%0.37%8.73%0.00%
SHAPX
ClearBridge Appreciation Fund
13.27%14.08%9.00%4.17%8.85%6.54%4.13%7.09%6.71%5.10%3.29%4.76%

Frequently Asked Questions


FKRCX and SHAPX have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FKRCX has higher volatility (13.60%) compared to SHAPX (2.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FKRCX dropped -78.85% vs SHAPX's -46.19%.

FKRCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.09 vs 1.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FKRCX and SHAPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer