PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FKRCX vs. FKGRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FKRCX vs. FKGRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Fund (FKRCX) and Franklin Growth Fund (FKGRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FKRCX achieves a -11.18% return, which is significantly lower than FKGRX's 3.38% return. Over the past 10 years, FKRCX has underperformed FKGRX with an annualized return of 12.98%, while FKGRX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.11% annualized return.


FKRCX

1D
-4.63%
1M
-17.01%
YTD
-11.18%
6M
-14.25%
1Y
61.63%
3Y*
47.42%
5Y*
19.32%
10Y*
12.98%

FKGRX

1D
0.18%
1M
-2.48%
YTD
3.38%
6M
2.19%
1Y
13.52%
3Y*
15.72%
5Y*
7.98%
10Y*
14.11%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FKRCX vs. FKGRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FKRCX
Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Fund
-11.18%196.59%17.64%2.03%-23.47%-4.03%44.30%51.48%-18.11%-0.12%
FKGRX
Franklin Growth Fund
3.38%15.38%17.96%27.54%-25.32%21.61%30.71%32.08%-3.37%26.31%

Correlation

The correlation between FKRCX and FKGRX is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.38

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.33

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.34

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.27

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 1980

0.20

The correlation between FKRCX and FKGRX shifts across timeframes, from 0.20 (all time) to 0.38 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FKRCX vs. FKGRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FKRCX
FKRCX Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
FKRCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FKRCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
FKRCX Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
FKRCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
FKRCX Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

FKGRX
FKGRX Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
FKGRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FKGRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
FKGRX Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
FKGRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
FKGRX Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FKRCX vs. FKGRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Fund (FKRCX) and Franklin Growth Fund (FKGRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FKRCXFKGRXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.33

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.30

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.18

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.74

1.21

+0.53

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.68

4.83

-0.15

FKRCX vs. FKGRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FKRCX Sharpe Ratio is 1.36, which is higher than the FKGRX Sharpe Ratio of 1.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FKRCX and FKGRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FKRCX vs. FKGRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FKRCX drawdown since its inception was -78.85%, which is greater than FKGRX's maximum drawdown of -51.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FKRCX and FKGRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FKRCXFKGRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-78.85%

-51.08%

-27.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-34.78%

-11.48%

-23.30%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-34.78%

-21.72%

-13.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-48.79%

-32.22%

-16.57%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-49.54%

-32.52%

-17.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-33.99%

-3.75%

-30.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-33.73%

-6.73%

-27.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.93%

2.87%

+10.06%

Volatility

FKRCX vs. FKGRX - Volatility Comparison

Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Fund (FKRCX) has a higher volatility of 17.83% compared to Franklin Growth Fund (FKGRX) at 5.10%. This indicates that FKRCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FKGRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FKRCXFKGRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.83%

5.10%

+12.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

38.33%

10.83%

+27.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

44.73%

13.62%

+31.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

34.45%

19.68%

+14.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.16%

19.55%

+13.61%

FKRCX vs. FKGRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FKRCX has a 0.88% expense ratio, which is higher than FKGRX's 0.79% expense ratio.


Dividends

FKRCX vs. FKGRX - Dividend Comparison

FKRCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.10%, less than FKGRX's 13.90% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FKGRX
Franklin Growth Fund
13.90%14.37%8.34%6.26%10.49%9.19%7.97%5.75%1.65%2.38%3.26%3.88%
FKRCX
Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Fund
12.10%10.75%13.44%3.12%0.00%9.37%10.55%0.00%0.00%0.37%8.73%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FKRCX and FKGRX have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FKRCX has higher volatility (17.83%) compared to FKGRX (5.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FKRCX dropped -78.85% vs FKGRX's -51.08%.

FKRCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.36 vs 1.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FKRCX and FKGRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer