PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FKIFX vs. LTTIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FKIFX vs. LTTIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Freedom Index 2010 Fund Investor Class (FKIFX) and MFS Lifetime 2025 Fund (LTTIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FKIFX achieves a 4.11% return, which is significantly higher than LTTIX's 2.74% return. Over the past 10 years, FKIFX has underperformed LTTIX with an annualized return of 5.50%, while LTTIX has yielded a comparatively higher 6.24% annualized return.


FKIFX

1D
-0.21%
1M
0.72%
YTD
4.11%
6M
4.04%
1Y
10.17%
3Y*
8.26%
5Y*
3.46%
10Y*
5.50%

LTTIX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.08%
YTD
2.74%
6M
2.59%
1Y
8.04%
3Y*
8.33%
5Y*
3.72%
10Y*
6.24%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FKIFX vs. LTTIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FKIFX
Fidelity Freedom Index 2010 Fund Investor Class
4.11%10.21%5.70%9.83%-12.94%5.05%10.41%14.33%-2.62%9.81%
LTTIX
MFS Lifetime 2025 Fund
2.74%9.29%6.73%10.36%-12.36%8.61%10.61%17.82%-3.97%13.16%

Correlation

The correlation between FKIFX and LTTIX is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2013

0.95

The correlation between FKIFX and LTTIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FKIFX vs. LTTIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FKIFX
FKIFX Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
FKIFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FKIFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
FKIFX Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
FKIFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
FKIFX Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

LTTIX
LTTIX Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
LTTIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LTTIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
LTTIX Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
LTTIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
LTTIX Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FKIFX vs. LTTIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Freedom Index 2010 Fund Investor Class (FKIFX) and MFS Lifetime 2025 Fund (LTTIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FKIFXLTTIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.42

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.87

2.47

+0.40

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.53

10.68

+1.85

FKIFX vs. LTTIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FKIFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.23, which is comparable to the LTTIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FKIFX and LTTIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FKIFX vs. LTTIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FKIFX drawdown since its inception was -17.50%, smaller than the maximum LTTIX drawdown of -19.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FKIFX and LTTIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FKIFXLTTIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.50%

-19.33%

+1.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.68%

-3.64%

-0.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.72%

-5.77%

+0.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.50%

-16.92%

-0.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-17.50%

-19.33%

+1.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.43%

-0.45%

+0.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.46%

-2.68%

+0.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.84%

0.84%

0.00%

Volatility

FKIFX vs. LTTIX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Freedom Index 2010 Fund Investor Class (FKIFX) has a higher volatility of 1.99% compared to MFS Lifetime 2025 Fund (LTTIX) at 1.34%. This indicates that FKIFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LTTIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FKIFXLTTIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.99%

1.34%

+0.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.01%

3.32%

+0.69%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.74%

4.18%

+0.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.17%

6.37%

-0.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.15%

7.24%

-1.09%

FKIFX vs. LTTIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FKIFX has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is higher than LTTIX's 0.00% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FKIFX vs. LTTIX - Dividend Comparison

FKIFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.76%, less than LTTIX's 11.54% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FKIFX
Fidelity Freedom Index 2010 Fund Investor Class
3.76%4.53%4.99%3.28%3.71%3.61%2.56%16.42%4.74%1.84%1.84%1.78%
LTTIX
MFS Lifetime 2025 Fund
11.54%8.13%7.07%3.30%5.88%7.35%2.83%3.68%4.32%3.51%4.03%1.82%

Frequently Asked Questions


FKIFX and LTTIX have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FKIFX has higher volatility (1.99%) compared to LTTIX (1.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FKIFX dropped -17.50% vs LTTIX's -19.33%.

FKIFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.23 vs 2.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FKIFX and LTTIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer