PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FKIDX vs. FISZX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FKIDX vs. FISZX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Diversified International K6 Fund (FKIDX) and Fidelity SAI International SMA Completion Fund (FISZX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FKIDX achieves a 10.84% return, which is significantly lower than FISZX's 26.54% return.


FKIDX

1D
-0.30%
1M
3.70%
YTD
10.84%
6M
14.26%
1Y
21.75%
3Y*
16.71%
5Y*
7.59%
10Y*

FISZX

1D
0.16%
1M
11.13%
YTD
26.54%
6M
33.08%
1Y
40.89%
3Y*
22.13%
5Y*
8.77%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FKIDX vs. FISZX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
FKIDX
Fidelity Diversified International K6 Fund
10.84%27.92%6.58%17.57%-23.30%13.35%19.41%14.04%
FISZX
Fidelity SAI International SMA Completion Fund
26.54%31.77%3.61%15.83%-28.32%9.91%23.49%13.42%

Correlation

The correlation between FKIDX and FISZX is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 12, 2019

0.94

The correlation between FKIDX and FISZX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FKIDX vs. FISZX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FKIDX
FKIDX Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
FKIDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FKIDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
FKIDX Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
FKIDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
FKIDX Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

FISZX
FISZX Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
FISZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FISZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
FISZX Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
FISZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
FISZX Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FKIDX vs. FISZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Diversified International K6 Fund (FKIDX) and Fidelity SAI International SMA Completion Fund (FISZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FKIDXFISZXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.37

2.27

-0.90

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.99

3.08

-1.08

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.41

-0.16

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.89

3.00

-1.10

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.40

11.85

-4.45

FKIDX vs. FISZX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FKIDX Sharpe Ratio is 1.37, which is lower than the FISZX Sharpe Ratio of 2.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FKIDX and FISZX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FKIDXFISZXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.37

2.27

-0.90

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

0.49

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.53

0.65

-0.11

Drawdowns

FKIDX vs. FISZX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FKIDX drawdown since its inception was -35.00%, smaller than the maximum FISZX drawdown of -39.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FKIDX and FISZX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FKIDXFISZXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.00%

-39.92%

+4.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.45%

-14.48%

+2.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.48%

-14.63%

+0.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.00%

-39.92%

+4.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.56%

0.00%

-0.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.20%

-12.38%

+4.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.18%

3.66%

-0.48%

Volatility

FKIDX vs. FISZX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Diversified International K6 Fund (FKIDX) is 6.16%, while Fidelity SAI International SMA Completion Fund (FISZX) has a volatility of 7.80%. This indicates that FKIDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FISZX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FKIDXFISZXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.16%

7.80%

-1.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.31%

16.25%

-1.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.99%

18.97%

-1.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.12%

17.84%

-0.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.23%

18.27%

-1.04%

FKIDX vs. FISZX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FKIDX has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than FISZX's 0.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

FKIDX vs. FISZX - Dividend Comparison

FKIDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.99%, more than FISZX's 1.52% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
FISZX
Fidelity SAI International SMA Completion Fund
1.52%1.92%2.55%1.89%1.37%6.08%0.90%0.27%0.00%0.00%
FKIDX
Fidelity Diversified International K6 Fund
1.99%2.21%2.22%1.55%0.84%0.97%0.61%1.57%1.38%0.19%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, FKIDX and FISZX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FISZX has higher volatility (7.80%) compared to FKIDX (6.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FKIDX dropped -35.00% vs FISZX's -39.92%.

FISZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.27 vs 1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FKIDX and FISZX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer