PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FKIDX vs. FTIHX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FKIDX vs. FTIHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Diversified International K6 Fund (FKIDX) and Fidelity Total International Index Fund (FTIHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FKIDX achieves a 14.73% return, which is significantly lower than FTIHX's 15.59% return.


FKIDX

1D
1.55%
1M
4.90%
YTD
14.73%
6M
15.31%
1Y
28.04%
3Y*
17.08%
5Y*
8.62%
10Y*

FTIHX

1D
1.37%
1M
3.09%
YTD
15.59%
6M
16.40%
1Y
33.74%
3Y*
18.58%
5Y*
9.19%
10Y*
9.72%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FKIDX vs. FTIHX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FKIDX
Fidelity Diversified International K6 Fund
14.73%27.92%6.58%17.57%-23.30%13.35%19.41%29.76%-15.21%8.61%
FTIHX
Fidelity Total International Index Fund
15.59%32.59%4.98%15.49%-16.29%8.45%11.09%21.50%-14.40%10.13%

Correlation

The correlation between FKIDX and FTIHX is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 25, 2017

0.94

The correlation between FKIDX and FTIHX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FKIDX vs. FTIHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FKIDX
FKIDX Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
FKIDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FKIDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
FKIDX Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
FKIDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
FKIDX Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

FTIHX
FTIHX Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
FTIHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTIHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTIHX Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
FTIHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTIHX Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FKIDX vs. FTIHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Diversified International K6 Fund (FKIDX) and Fidelity Total International Index Fund (FTIHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FKIDXFTIHXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.62

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.72

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.40

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.20

2.92

-0.72

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.53

11.31

-2.78

FKIDX vs. FTIHX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FKIDX Sharpe Ratio is 1.53, which is comparable to the FTIHX Sharpe Ratio of 2.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FKIDX and FTIHX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FKIDX vs. FTIHX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FKIDX drawdown since its inception was -35.00%, roughly equal to the maximum FTIHX drawdown of -35.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FKIDX and FTIHX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FKIDXFTIHXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.00%

-35.75%

+0.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.45%

-11.25%

-1.20%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.48%

-13.15%

-1.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.00%

-29.99%

-5.01%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.16%

-7.19%

-0.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.20%

2.90%

+0.30%

Volatility

FKIDX vs. FTIHX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Diversified International K6 Fund (FKIDX) has a higher volatility of 6.96% compared to Fidelity Total International Index Fund (FTIHX) at 6.33%. This indicates that FKIDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FTIHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FKIDXFTIHXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.96%

6.33%

+0.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.43%

13.24%

+2.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.91%

15.25%

+2.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.33%

15.46%

+1.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.31%

16.12%

+1.19%

FKIDX vs. FTIHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FKIDX has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than FTIHX's 0.06% expense ratio.


Dividends

FKIDX vs. FTIHX - Dividend Comparison

FKIDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.92%, less than FTIHX's 2.41% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
FKIDX
Fidelity Diversified International K6 Fund
1.92%2.21%2.22%1.55%0.84%0.97%0.61%1.57%1.38%0.19%0.00%
FTIHX
Fidelity Total International Index Fund
2.41%2.78%2.88%2.78%2.51%2.55%1.62%2.61%2.21%0.45%0.47%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, FKIDX and FTIHX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FKIDX has higher volatility (6.96%) compared to FTIHX (6.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FKIDX dropped -35.00% vs FTIHX's -35.75%.

FTIHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.15 vs 1.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FKIDX and FTIHX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer