PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FKGLX vs. JRLVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FKGLX vs. JRLVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2040 Fund Class Z6 (FKGLX) and John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2045 Lifetime Portfolio (JRLVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FKGLX having a 9.76% return and JRLVX slightly higher at 9.95%.


FKGLX

1D
0.15%
1M
-0.30%
YTD
9.76%
6M
9.14%
1Y
21.79%
3Y*
19.19%
5Y*
9.34%
10Y*

JRLVX

1D
0.06%
1M
-0.99%
YTD
9.95%
6M
9.04%
1Y
22.74%
3Y*
17.76%
5Y*
8.80%
10Y*
11.47%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FKGLX vs. JRLVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FKGLX
Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2040 Fund Class Z6
9.76%21.77%16.27%19.02%-17.89%16.35%17.80%27.00%-8.05%7.80%
JRLVX
John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2045 Lifetime Portfolio
9.95%19.25%14.50%18.00%-18.06%18.45%16.23%25.03%-8.29%6.71%

Correlation

The correlation between FKGLX and JRLVX is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.97

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 15, 2017

0.98

The correlation between FKGLX and JRLVX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FKGLX vs. JRLVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FKGLX
FKGLX Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
FKGLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FKGLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
FKGLX Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
FKGLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
FKGLX Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

JRLVX
JRLVX Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
JRLVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JRLVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
JRLVX Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
JRLVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
JRLVX Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FKGLX vs. JRLVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2040 Fund Class Z6 (FKGLX) and John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2045 Lifetime Portfolio (JRLVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FKGLXJRLVXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.35

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.48

2.66

-0.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.55

11.47

-0.92

FKGLX vs. JRLVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FKGLX Sharpe Ratio is 1.78, which is comparable to the JRLVX Sharpe Ratio of 1.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FKGLX and JRLVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FKGLX vs. JRLVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FKGLX drawdown since its inception was -31.23%, roughly equal to the maximum JRLVX drawdown of -32.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FKGLX and JRLVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FKGLXJRLVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.23%

-32.53%

+1.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.82%

-8.50%

-0.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.78%

-15.27%

+1.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.05%

-25.64%

-1.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.99%

-2.12%

+0.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.40%

-4.54%

-0.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.06%

1.97%

+0.09%

Volatility

FKGLX vs. JRLVX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2040 Fund Class Z6 (FKGLX) has a higher volatility of 5.37% compared to John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2045 Lifetime Portfolio (JRLVX) at 5.05%. This indicates that FKGLX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JRLVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FKGLXJRLVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.37%

5.05%

+0.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.49%

9.99%

+0.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.33%

12.08%

+0.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.48%

14.90%

-0.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.74%

15.98%

-0.24%

FKGLX vs. JRLVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FKGLX has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than JRLVX's 0.01% expense ratio.


Dividends

FKGLX vs. JRLVX - Dividend Comparison

FKGLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.07%, more than JRLVX's 3.23% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FKGLX
Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2040 Fund Class Z6
8.07%7.40%5.77%1.58%11.37%10.16%6.18%7.47%12.35%2.66%0.00%0.00%
JRLVX
John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2045 Lifetime Portfolio
3.23%3.55%1.89%2.24%8.03%6.00%4.26%8.99%10.96%4.29%3.40%1.90%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.98, FKGLX and JRLVX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FKGLX has higher volatility (5.37%) compared to JRLVX (5.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FKGLX dropped -31.23% vs JRLVX's -32.53%.

JRLVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.88 vs 1.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FKGLX and JRLVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer