PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
FKEMX vs. FIQGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

FKEMX vs. FIQGX

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Emerging Markets K (FKEMX) and Fidelity Advisor Emerging Markets Discovery Fund Class Z (FIQGX).

FKEMX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on May 9, 2008. FIQGX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Oct 2, 2018.

Performance

FKEMX vs. FIQGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Emerging Markets K (FKEMX) and Fidelity Advisor Emerging Markets Discovery Fund Class Z (FIQGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

FKEMX vs. FIQGX - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FKEMX
Fidelity Emerging Markets K		0.98%31.18%7.26%15.36%-27.42%1.40%32.68%33.86%-2.68%
FIQGX
Fidelity Advisor Emerging Markets Discovery Fund Class Z		6.15%31.96%-3.54%20.94%-11.74%6.86%17.11%19.81%-1.18%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FKEMX achieves a 0.98% return, which is significantly lower than FIQGX's 6.15% return.

FKEMX

1D
3.49%
1M
-7.62%
YTD
0.98%
6M
4.40%
1Y
33.13%
3Y*
14.76%
5Y*
3.11%
10Y*
10.08%

FIQGX

1D
1.90%
1M
-6.09%
YTD
6.15%
6M
11.78%
1Y
36.85%
3Y*
15.79%
5Y*
7.98%
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Fidelity Emerging Markets K

Fidelity Advisor Emerging Markets Discovery Fund Class Z

Often compared with FKEMX:
FKEMX vs. FEMKXFKEMX vs. FZAEXFKEMX vs. GICIXFKEMX vs. FXAIXFKEMX vs. VWOFKEMX vs. FNILXFKEMX vs. FDGRX
Often compared with FIQGX:
FIQGX vs. FEDDXFIQGX vs. PZIEXFIQGX vs. FEDAXFIQGX vs. CNWIXFIQGX vs. JEMWXFIQGX vs. ODVIXFIQGX vs. DEMAX

FKEMX vs. FIQGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FKEMX has a 0.77% expense ratio, which is lower than FIQGX's 1.05% expense ratio.

FIQGX
Fidelity Advisor Emerging Markets Discovery Fund Class Z
FKEMX
Fidelity Emerging Markets K

Return for Risk

FKEMX vs. FIQGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
FKEMX
FKEMX Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
FKEMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FKEMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
FKEMX Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
FKEMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
FKEMX Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
FIQGX
FIQGX Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
FIQGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIQGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIQGX Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
FIQGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIQGX Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FKEMX vs. FIQGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Emerging Markets K (FKEMX) and Fidelity Advisor Emerging Markets Discovery Fund Class Z (FIQGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

FKEMXFIQGXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.75

2.64

-0.89

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.36

3.28

-0.92

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.50

-0.16

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.36

3.70

-1.34

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.85

14.41

-5.56

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FKEMX vs. FIQGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FKEMX Sharpe Ratio is 1.75, which is lower than the FIQGX Sharpe Ratio of 2.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FKEMX and FIQGX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

FKEMXFIQGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.75

2.64

-0.89

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.17

0.57

-0.40

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

—

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.18

0.64

-0.47

Correlation

The correlation between FKEMX and FIQGX is 0.86, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

FKEMX vs. FIQGX - Dividend Comparison

FKEMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.07%, less than FIQGX's 4.59% yield.

TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FKEMX
Fidelity Emerging Markets K		0.07%0.07%0.78%1.24%0.89%6.18%1.46%1.85%1.00%0.08%0.84%0.70%
FIQGX
Fidelity Advisor Emerging Markets Discovery Fund Class Z		4.59%4.87%4.07%2.20%1.86%12.04%0.71%1.22%2.16%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

FKEMX vs. FIQGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FKEMX drawdown since its inception was -69.07%, which is greater than FIQGX's maximum drawdown of -38.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FKEMX and FIQGX.

Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators

FKEMXFIQGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-69.07%

-38.41%

-30.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.00%

-9.94%

-3.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.79%

-27.36%

-13.43%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.13%

—

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.97%

-7.83%

-2.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.49%

-7.02%

-14.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.47%

2.55%

+0.92%

Volatility

FKEMX vs. FIQGX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Emerging Markets K (FKEMX) has a higher volatility of 9.99% compared to Fidelity Advisor Emerging Markets Discovery Fund Class Z (FIQGX) at 6.78%. This indicates that FKEMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FIQGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period

FKEMXFIQGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.99%

6.78%

+3.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.56%

9.92%

+4.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.60%

14.45%

+5.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.56%

14.01%

+4.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.46%

16.77%

+1.69%