FKEMX vs. CNWIX

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

FKEMX (Fidelity Emerging Markets K) and CNWIX (Calamos Evolving World Growth Fund Class I) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, FKEMX returned 12.32%/yr vs 11.97%/yr for CNWIX. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FKEMX charges 0.77%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for CNWIX.

Performance

FKEMX vs. CNWIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Emerging Markets K (FKEMX) and Calamos Evolving World Growth Fund Class I (CNWIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FKEMX achieves a 23.24% return, which is significantly lower than CNWIX's 42.33% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FKEMX having a 12.32% annualized return and CNWIX not far behind at 11.97%.

FKEMX

• 1D: 0.56%
• 1M: 0.69%
• YTD: 23.24%
• 6M: 24.36%
• 1Y: 44.75%
• 3Y*: 22.06%
• 5Y*: 6.38%
• 10Y*: 12.32%

CNWIX

• 1D: 0.25%
• 1M: -1.77%
• YTD: 42.33%
• 6M: 43.65%
• 1Y: 54.54%
• 3Y*: 26.98%
• 5Y*: 7.51%
• 10Y*: 11.97%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FKEMX vs. CNWIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FKEMX Fidelity Emerging Markets K	23.24%	31.18%	7.26%	15.36%	-27.42%	1.40%	32.68%	33.86%	-17.92%	46.97%
CNWIX Calamos Evolving World Growth Fund Class I	42.33%	19.29%	14.99%	6.60%	-24.35%	-4.70%	54.23%	20.76%	-17.74%	36.97%

Correlation

The correlation between FKEMX and CNWIX is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.90
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.91
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.92
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.94
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 18, 2008	0.92

The correlation between FKEMX and CNWIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FKEMX vs. CNWIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FKEMX

FKEMX Risk / Return Rank: 73
FKEMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
FKEMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
FKEMX Omega Ratio Rank: 73
FKEMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
FKEMX Martin Ratio Rank: 80

CNWIX

CNWIX Risk / Return Rank: 71
CNWIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
CNWIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
CNWIX Omega Ratio Rank: 73
CNWIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
CNWIX Martin Ratio Rank: 74

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FKEMX vs. CNWIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Emerging Markets K (FKEMX) and Calamos Evolving World Growth Fund Class I (CNWIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FKEMX	CNWIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.07	2.04	+0.03
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.60	2.51	+0.09
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.39	1.39	0.00
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.53	3.36	+0.17
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.49	11.63	+0.86

FKEMX vs. CNWIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FKEMX Sharpe Ratio is 2.07, which is comparable to the CNWIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FKEMX and CNWIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FKEMX vs. CNWIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FKEMX drawdown since its inception was -69.07%, which is greater than CNWIX's maximum drawdown of -43.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FKEMX and CNWIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FKEMX	CNWIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-69.07%	-43.57%	-25.50%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.00%	-16.28%	+3.28%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.08%	-19.34%	+0.26%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-40.79%	-37.36%	-3.43%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-43.13%	-43.57%	+0.44%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.49%	-6.25%	+1.76%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-21.24%	-16.39%	-4.85%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.66%	4.70%	-1.04%

Volatility

FKEMX vs. CNWIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Emerging Markets K (FKEMX) is 12.99%, while Calamos Evolving World Growth Fund Class I (CNWIX) has a volatility of 15.49%. This indicates that FKEMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CNWIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FKEMX	CNWIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.99%	15.49%	-2.50%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.98%	24.69%	-4.71%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.26%	26.92%	-4.66%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.65%	19.49%	+0.16%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.99%	24.82%	-5.83%

FKEMX vs. CNWIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FKEMX has a 0.77% expense ratio, which is lower than CNWIX's 1.05% expense ratio.

Dividends

FKEMX vs. CNWIX - Dividend Comparison

FKEMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.06%, more than CNWIX's 0.04% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CNWIX Calamos Evolving World Growth Fund Class I	0.04%	0.06%	0.00%	0.54%	0.97%	2.79%	2.01%	1.04%	0.00%	0.42%	0.00%	0.38%
FKEMX Fidelity Emerging Markets K	0.06%	0.07%	0.78%	1.24%	0.89%	6.18%	1.46%	1.85%	1.00%	0.08%	0.84%	0.70%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FKEMX and CNWIX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.90, FKEMX and CNWIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, FKEMX or CNWIX?

CNWIX has higher volatility (15.49%) compared to FKEMX (12.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FKEMX dropped -69.07% vs CNWIX's -43.57%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FKEMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.07 vs 2.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.