PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FKEMX vs. BADEX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FKEMX vs. BADEX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Emerging Markets K (FKEMX) and BlackRock Defensive Advantage Emerging Markets Fund (BADEX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FKEMX having a 13.98% return and BADEX slightly higher at 14.36%.


FKEMX

1D
3.85%
1M
-4.45%
6M
6.79%
YTD
13.98%
1Y
33.44%
3Y*
16.72%
5Y*
6.19%
10Y*
10.55%
ALL TIME*
4.50%

BADEX

1D
2.44%
1M
-1.28%
6M
8.24%
YTD
14.36%
1Y
20.71%
3Y*
12.76%
5Y*
7.59%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
7.76%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

FKEMX vs. BADEX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
FKEMX
Fidelity Emerging Markets K
13.98%31.18%7.26%15.36%-27.42%1.40%2.40%
BADEX
BlackRock Defensive Advantage Emerging Markets Fund
14.36%13.95%10.15%11.67%-11.34%4.49%2.32%

Correlation

The correlation between FKEMX and BADEX is 0.84, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.84

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.80

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 24, 2020

0.82

The correlation between FKEMX and BADEX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FKEMX vs. BADEX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FKEMX
FKEMX Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
FKEMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FKEMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
FKEMX Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
FKEMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
FKEMX Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

BADEX
BADEX Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
BADEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BADEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
BADEX Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
BADEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
BADEX Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FKEMX vs. BADEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Emerging Markets K (FKEMX) and BlackRock Defensive Advantage Emerging Markets Fund (BADEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FKEMXBADEXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.28

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.29

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.08

2.20

-0.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.81

7.37

-0.56

FKEMX vs. BADEX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FKEMX Sharpe Ratio is 1.29, which is comparable to the BADEX Sharpe Ratio of 1.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FKEMX and BADEX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FKEMX vs. BADEX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FKEMX drawdown since its inception was -69.07%, which is greater than BADEX's maximum drawdown of -21.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FKEMX and BADEX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FKEMXBADEXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-69.07%

-21.86%

-47.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.94%

-8.89%

-6.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.08%

-8.89%

-10.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.42%

-20.57%

-19.85%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.66%

-5.52%

-6.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.17%

-5.56%

-15.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.55%

2.65%

+1.90%

Volatility

FKEMX vs. BADEX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Emerging Markets K (FKEMX) has a higher volatility of 9.59% compared to BlackRock Defensive Advantage Emerging Markets Fund (BADEX) at 6.13%. This indicates that FKEMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BADEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FKEMXBADEXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.59%

6.13%

+3.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.93%

12.54%

+9.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.13%

13.37%

+10.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.00%

10.85%

+9.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.19%

10.92%

+8.27%

FKEMX vs. BADEX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FKEMX has a 0.77% expense ratio, which is lower than BADEX's 1.06% expense ratio.


Dividends

FKEMX vs. BADEX - Dividend Comparison

FKEMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.06%, less than BADEX's 11.51% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BADEX
BlackRock Defensive Advantage Emerging Markets Fund
11.51%7.52%2.27%1.92%2.43%7.54%0.03%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FKEMX
Fidelity Emerging Markets K
0.06%0.07%0.78%1.24%0.89%6.18%1.46%1.85%1.00%0.08%0.84%0.70%

Frequently Asked Questions


FKEMX and BADEX have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FKEMX has higher volatility (9.59%) compared to BADEX (6.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FKEMX dropped -69.07% vs BADEX's -21.86%.

BADEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.47 vs 1.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FKEMX and BADEX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer