PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FJUN vs. VTI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FJUN vs. VTI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - June (FJUN) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FJUN achieves a 4.64% return, which is significantly lower than VTI's 11.20% return.


FJUN

1D
-0.18%
1M
1.03%
YTD
4.64%
6M
5.30%
1Y
13.82%
3Y*
14.38%
5Y*
11.05%
10Y*

VTI

1D
-0.72%
1M
4.99%
YTD
11.20%
6M
11.09%
1Y
28.18%
3Y*
22.07%
5Y*
12.69%
10Y*
15.05%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FJUN vs. VTI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
FJUN
FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - June
4.64%11.05%16.38%22.30%-4.95%11.47%11.67%
VTI
Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
11.20%17.10%23.81%26.05%-19.52%25.68%24.63%

Correlation

The correlation between FJUN and VTI is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2020

0.94

The correlation between FJUN and VTI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

FJUN vs. VTI - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FJUN
VTI

Technology

36.2%
33.5%

Financial Services

11.9%
12.0%

Communication Services

10.9%
10.3%

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%
10.0%

Healthcare

8.4%
9.2%

Industrials

8.1%
9.8%

Consumer Defensive

4.9%
4.7%

Energy

3.5%
3.7%

Utilities

2.3%
2.3%

Real Estate

1.9%
2.4%

Basic Materials

1.8%
2.0%

Technology

FJUN
36.2%
VTI
33.5%

Financial Services

FJUN
11.9%
VTI
12.0%

Communication Services

FJUN
10.9%
VTI
10.3%

Consumer Cyclical

FJUN
10.1%
VTI
10.0%

Healthcare

FJUN
8.4%
VTI
9.2%

Industrials

FJUN
8.1%
VTI
9.8%

Consumer Defensive

FJUN
4.9%
VTI
4.7%

Energy

FJUN
3.5%
VTI
3.7%

Utilities

FJUN
2.3%
VTI
2.3%

Real Estate

FJUN
1.9%
VTI
2.4%

Basic Materials

FJUN
1.8%
VTI
2.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FJUN vs. VTI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FJUN
FJUN Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
FJUN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FJUN Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
FJUN Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
FJUN Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
FJUN Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

VTI
VTI Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
VTI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTI Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTI Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
VTI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTI Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FJUN vs. VTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - June (FJUN) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FJUNVTIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.25

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

1.42

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.36

3.17

+0.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.98

14.62

+4.36

FJUN vs. VTI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FJUN Sharpe Ratio is 2.28, which is comparable to the VTI Sharpe Ratio of 2.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FJUN and VTI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FJUNVTIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.28

2.33

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.05

0.73

+0.32

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.17

0.51

+0.66

Drawdowns

FJUN vs. VTI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FJUN drawdown since its inception was -13.26%, smaller than the maximum VTI drawdown of -55.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FJUN and VTI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FJUNVTIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.26%

-55.45%

+42.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.13%

-8.92%

+4.79%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.26%

-19.30%

+6.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.26%

-25.36%

+12.10%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.18%

-0.72%

+0.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.67%

-8.03%

+6.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.73%

1.93%

-1.20%

Volatility

FJUN vs. VTI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - June (FJUN) is 0.41%, while Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) has a volatility of 2.96%. This indicates that FJUN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VTI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FJUNVTIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.41%

2.96%

-2.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.35%

9.13%

-4.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.11%

12.17%

-6.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.55%

17.40%

-6.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.27%

18.30%

-8.03%

FJUN vs. VTI - Expense Ratio Comparison

FJUN has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than VTI's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

FJUN vs. VTI - Dividend Comparison

FJUN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VTI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.01%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FJUN
FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - June
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VTI
Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
1.01%1.12%1.27%1.44%1.66%1.21%1.42%1.78%2.04%1.71%1.92%1.98%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, FJUN and VTI move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

VTI has higher volatility (2.96%) compared to FJUN (0.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FJUN dropped -13.26% vs VTI's -55.45%.

On 5-year performance, VTI leads with 12.69% vs 11.05% for FJUN. On fees, VTI is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, FJUN has been the lower-risk option at 0.41%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, VTI has performed better with a 12.69% return vs 11.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VTI is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for FJUN.

VTI has the higher dividend yield at 1.01%, compared with 0.00% for FJUN.

FJUN tracks Cboe S&P 500 Buffer Protect Index June, while VTI tracks CRSP US Total Market Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for FJUN and 0.03% for VTI.

VTI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 2.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FJUN and VTI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer