FJUN vs. VTI
FJUN (FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - June) and VTI (Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds - FJUN tracks the Cboe S&P 500 Buffer Protect Index June while VTI tracks the CRSP US Total Market Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FJUN returned 11.05%/yr vs 12.69%/yr for VTI. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FJUN charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VTI.
Performance
FJUN vs. VTI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FJUN achieves a 4.64% return, which is significantly lower than VTI's 11.20% return.
FJUN
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- 1.03%
- YTD
- 4.64%
- 6M
- 5.30%
- 1Y
- 13.82%
- 3Y*
- 14.38%
- 5Y*
- 11.05%
- 10Y*
- —
VTI
- 1D
- -0.72%
- 1M
- 4.99%
- YTD
- 11.20%
- 6M
- 11.09%
- 1Y
- 28.18%
- 3Y*
- 22.07%
- 5Y*
- 12.69%
- 10Y*
- 15.05%
FJUN vs. VTI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FJUN FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - June | 4.64% | 11.05% | 16.38% | 22.30% | -4.95% | 11.47% | 11.67% |
VTI Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF | 11.20% | 17.10% | 23.81% | 26.05% | -19.52% | 25.68% | 24.63% |
Correlation
The correlation between FJUN and VTI is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2020 | 0.94 |
The correlation between FJUN and VTI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.
FJUN vs. VTI - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FJUN
VTI
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
FJUN
VTI
Financial Services
FJUN
VTI
Communication Services
FJUN
VTI
Consumer Cyclical
FJUN
VTI
Healthcare
FJUN
VTI
Industrials
FJUN
VTI
Consumer Defensive
FJUN
VTI
Energy
FJUN
VTI
Utilities
FJUN
VTI
Real Estate
FJUN
VTI
Basic Materials
FJUN
VTI
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FJUN vs. VTI — Risk / Return Rank
FJUN
VTI
FJUN vs. VTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - June (FJUN) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FJUN | VTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.04 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.25 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.49 | 1.42 | +0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.36 | 3.17 | +0.18 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.98 | 14.62 | +4.36 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FJUN | VTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.28 | 2.33 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.05 | 0.73 | +0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.82 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.17 | 0.51 | +0.66 |
Drawdowns
FJUN vs. VTI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FJUN drawdown since its inception was -13.26%, smaller than the maximum VTI drawdown of -55.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FJUN and VTI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FJUN | VTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.26% | -55.45% | +42.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.13% | -8.92% | +4.79% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.26% | -19.30% | +6.04% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -13.26% | -25.36% | +12.10% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.00% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.18% | -0.72% | +0.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.67% | -8.03% | +6.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.73% | 1.93% | -1.20% |
Volatility
FJUN vs. VTI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - June (FJUN) is 0.41%, while Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) has a volatility of 2.96%. This indicates that FJUN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VTI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FJUN | VTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.41% | 2.96% | -2.55% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.35% | 9.13% | -4.78% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.11% | 12.17% | -6.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.55% | 17.40% | -6.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.27% | 18.30% | -8.03% |
FJUN vs. VTI - Expense Ratio Comparison
FJUN has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than VTI's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
FJUN vs. VTI - Dividend Comparison
FJUN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VTI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.01%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FJUN FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - June | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VTI Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF | 1.01% | 1.12% | 1.27% | 1.44% | 1.66% | 1.21% | 1.42% | 1.78% | 2.04% | 1.71% | 1.92% | 1.98% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.93, FJUN and VTI move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
VTI has higher volatility (2.96%) compared to FJUN (0.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FJUN dropped -13.26% vs VTI's -55.45%.
On 5-year performance, VTI leads with 12.69% vs 11.05% for FJUN. On fees, VTI is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, FJUN has been the lower-risk option at 0.41%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, VTI has performed better with a 12.69% return vs 11.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VTI is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for FJUN.
VTI has the higher dividend yield at 1.01%, compared with 0.00% for FJUN.
FJUN tracks Cboe S&P 500 Buffer Protect Index June, while VTI tracks CRSP US Total Market Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for FJUN and 0.03% for VTI.
VTI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 2.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FJUN and VTI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer