FJUN vs. RSBY

Last updated Jul 12, 2026

FJUN (FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - June) and RSBY (Return Stacked Bonds & Futures Yield ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FJUN is a Defined Outcome fund tracking the Cboe S&P 500 Buffer Protect Index June, while RSBY is a Multistrategy fund actively managed by Return Stacked. FJUN is passively managed, while RSBY is actively managed. Over the past year, FJUN returned 12.07% vs 17.35% for RSBY. At a correlation of -0.19, they often move in opposite directions. FJUN charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.98%/yr for RSBY.

Performance

FJUN vs. RSBY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - June (FJUN) and Return Stacked Bonds & Futures Yield ETF (RSBY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FJUN achieves a 5.82% return, which is significantly lower than RSBY's 18.52% return.

FJUN

• 1D: 0.27%
• 1M: 0.89%
• 6M: 5.05%
• YTD: 5.82%
• 1Y: 12.07%
• 3Y*: 13.40%
• 5Y*: 10.67%
• 10Y*: —

RSBY

• 1D: -0.60%
• 1M: -0.71%
• 6M: 17.92%
• YTD: 18.52%
• 1Y: 17.35%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FJUN vs. RSBY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
FJUN FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - June	5.82%	11.05%	4.07%
RSBY Return Stacked Bonds & Futures Yield ETF	18.52%	-12.98%	-7.79%

Correlation

The correlation between FJUN and RSBY is -0.24, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.24
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 21, 2024	-0.19

Return for Risk

FJUN vs. RSBY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FJUN

FJUN Risk / Return Rank: 84
FJUN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
FJUN Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
FJUN Omega Ratio Rank: 88
FJUN Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
FJUN Martin Ratio Rank: 90

RSBY

RSBY Risk / Return Rank: 51
RSBY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
RSBY Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
RSBY Omega Ratio Rank: 51
RSBY Calmar Ratio Rank: 54
RSBY Martin Ratio Rank: 40

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FJUN vs. RSBY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - June (FJUN) and Return Stacked Bonds & Futures Yield ETF (RSBY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FJUN	RSBY	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.05	1.50	+0.55
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.16	2.18	+0.97
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.43	1.26	+0.18
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.86	2.15	+0.71
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	16.17	5.04	+11.13

FJUN vs. RSBY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FJUN Sharpe Ratio is 2.05, which is higher than the RSBY Sharpe Ratio of 1.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FJUN and RSBY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FJUN vs. RSBY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FJUN drawdown since its inception was -13.26%, smaller than the maximum RSBY drawdown of -23.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FJUN and RSBY.

Drawdown Indicators

	FJUN	RSBY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-13.26%	-23.32%	+10.06%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.13%	-7.95%	+3.82%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.26%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-13.26%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-6.45%	+6.45%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.65%	-13.35%	+11.70%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.73%	3.39%	-2.66%

Volatility

FJUN vs. RSBY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - June (FJUN) is 1.86%, while Return Stacked Bonds & Futures Yield ETF (RSBY) has a volatility of 3.15%. This indicates that FJUN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RSBY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FJUN	RSBY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.86%	3.15%	-1.29%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.64%	8.37%	-3.73%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.76%	11.41%	-5.65%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.56%	13.37%	-2.81%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.23%	13.37%	-3.14%

FJUN vs. RSBY - Expense Ratio Comparison

FJUN has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than RSBY's 0.98% expense ratio.

Dividends

FJUN vs. RSBY - Dividend Comparison

FJUN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RSBY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.75%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
FJUN FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - June	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
RSBY Return Stacked Bonds & Futures Yield ETF	1.75%	2.07%	2.29%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FJUN and RSBY in my portfolio?

FJUN and RSBY have a correlation of -0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FJUN or RSBY?

RSBY has higher volatility (3.15%) compared to FJUN (1.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FJUN dropped -13.26% vs RSBY's -23.32%.

Which ETF is better, FJUN or RSBY?

On 1-year performance, RSBY leads with 17.35% vs 12.07% for FJUN. On fees, FJUN is cheaper at 0.85% per year. On volatility, FJUN has been the lower-risk option at 1.86%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FJUN or RSBY?

Over the 1-year period, RSBY has performed better with a 17.35% return vs 12.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FJUN or RSBY?

FJUN is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 0.98% for RSBY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FJUN or RSBY?

RSBY has the higher dividend yield at 1.75%, compared with 0.00% for FJUN.

What is the main difference between FJUN and RSBY?

FJUN is categorized as Defined Outcome, while RSBY is Multistrategy. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Return Stacked. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for FJUN and 0.98% for RSBY.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FJUN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.05 vs 1.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.