FJUN vs. RDVY
FJUN (FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - June) and RDVY (First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds from First Trust - FJUN tracks the Cboe S&P 500 Buffer Protect Index June while RDVY tracks the NASDAQ US Rising Dividend Achievers. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FJUN returned 11.07%/yr vs 11.26%/yr for RDVY. A 0.80 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FJUN charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for RDVY.
Performance
FJUN vs. RDVY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FJUN achieves a 4.73% return, which is significantly lower than RDVY's 11.06% return.
FJUN
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- 0.87%
- YTD
- 4.73%
- 6M
- 5.29%
- 1Y
- 13.94%
- 3Y*
- 14.49%
- 5Y*
- 11.07%
- 10Y*
- —
RDVY
- 1D
- 1.13%
- 1M
- 3.30%
- YTD
- 11.06%
- 6M
- 11.87%
- 1Y
- 28.04%
- 3Y*
- 21.09%
- 5Y*
- 11.26%
- 10Y*
- 15.65%
FJUN vs. RDVY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FJUN FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - June | 4.73% | 11.05% | 16.38% | 22.30% | -4.95% | 11.47% | 11.67% |
RDVY First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF | 11.06% | 18.90% | 16.41% | 20.38% | -13.27% | 31.14% | 30.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between FJUN and RDVY is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2020 | 0.80 |
The correlation between FJUN and RDVY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.
FJUN vs. RDVY - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FJUN
RDVY
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
Technology
FJUN
RDVY
Financial Services
FJUN
RDVY
Communication Services
FJUN
RDVY
Consumer Cyclical
FJUN
RDVY
Healthcare
FJUN
RDVY
Industrials
FJUN
RDVY
Consumer Defensive
FJUN
RDVY
Energy
FJUN
RDVY
Utilities
FJUN
RDVY
Real Estate
FJUN
RDVY
-
Basic Materials
FJUN
RDVY
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FJUN vs. RDVY — Risk / Return Rank
FJUN
RDVY
FJUN vs. RDVY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - June (FJUN) and First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF (RDVY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FJUN | RDVY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.30 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.60 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.49 | 1.35 | +0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.39 | 3.12 | +0.27 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 19.19 | 13.11 | +6.08 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FJUN | RDVY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.30 | 2.01 | +0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.05 | 0.60 | +0.46 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.74 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.17 | 0.67 | +0.50 |
Drawdowns
FJUN vs. RDVY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FJUN drawdown since its inception was -13.26%, smaller than the maximum RDVY drawdown of -40.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FJUN and RDVY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FJUN | RDVY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.26% | -40.60% | +27.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.13% | -9.04% | +4.91% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.26% | -19.11% | +5.85% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -13.26% | -25.32% | +12.06% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -40.60% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.10% | 0.00% | -0.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.67% | -5.00% | +3.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.73% | 2.14% | -1.41% |
Volatility
FJUN vs. RDVY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - June (FJUN) is 0.35%, while First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF (RDVY) has a volatility of 4.01%. This indicates that FJUN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RDVY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FJUN | RDVY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.35% | 4.01% | -3.66% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.35% | 10.99% | -6.64% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.08% | 14.04% | -7.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.55% | 18.92% | -8.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.26% | 21.11% | -10.85% |
FJUN vs. RDVY - Expense Ratio Comparison
FJUN has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than RDVY's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
FJUN vs. RDVY - Dividend Comparison
FJUN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RDVY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.91%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FJUN FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - June | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RDVY First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF | 0.91% | 1.11% | 1.64% | 2.09% | 2.21% | 1.04% | 1.53% | 1.55% | 1.68% | 1.25% | 2.07% | 2.14% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FJUN and RDVY have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RDVY has higher volatility (4.01%) compared to FJUN (0.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FJUN dropped -13.26% vs RDVY's -40.60%.
On 5-year performance, RDVY leads with 11.26% vs 11.07% for FJUN. On fees, RDVY is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, FJUN has been the lower-risk option at 0.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, RDVY has performed better with a 11.26% return vs 11.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
RDVY is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for FJUN.
RDVY has the higher dividend yield at 0.91%, compared with 0.00% for FJUN.
FJUN tracks Cboe S&P 500 Buffer Protect Index June, while RDVY tracks NASDAQ US Rising Dividend Achievers. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for FJUN and 0.50% for RDVY.
FJUN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.30 vs 2.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FJUN and RDVY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer