FJUN vs. RBIL

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

FJUN (FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - June) and RBIL (F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FJUN is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Cboe S&P 500 Buffer Protect Index June, while RBIL is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg US Ultrashort TIPS 1-13 Months Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, FJUN returned 14.16% vs 3.95% for RBIL. At a correlation of -0.18, they often move in opposite directions. FJUN charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.17%/yr for RBIL.

Performance

FJUN vs. RBIL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - June (FJUN) and F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FJUN achieves a 4.84% return, which is significantly higher than RBIL's 2.31% return.

FJUN

• 1D: -0.17%
• 1M: 0.37%
• YTD: 4.84%
• 6M: 4.78%
• 1Y: 14.16%
• 3Y*: 13.60%
• 5Y*: 10.79%
• 10Y*: —

RBIL

• 1D: -0.05%
• 1M: -0.20%
• YTD: 2.31%
• 6M: 2.35%
• 1Y: 3.95%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FJUN vs. RBIL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
FJUN FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - June	4.84%	9.11%
RBIL F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF	2.31%	2.85%

Correlation

The correlation between FJUN and RBIL is -0.21, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.22
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2025	-0.18

Return for Risk

FJUN vs. RBIL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FJUN

FJUN Risk / Return Rank: 84
FJUN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
FJUN Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
FJUN Omega Ratio Rank: 90
FJUN Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
FJUN Martin Ratio Rank: 90

RBIL

RBIL Risk / Return Rank: 97
RBIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
RBIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
RBIL Omega Ratio Rank: 98
RBIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
RBIL Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FJUN vs. RBIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - June (FJUN) and F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FJUN	RBIL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.54	4.18	-1.64
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.89	6.39	-2.50
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.55	2.06	-0.51
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.44	7.59	-4.14
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	19.85	44.07	-24.23

FJUN vs. RBIL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FJUN Sharpe Ratio is 2.54, which is lower than the RBIL Sharpe Ratio of 4.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FJUN and RBIL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FJUN vs. RBIL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FJUN drawdown since its inception was -13.26%, which is greater than RBIL's maximum drawdown of -0.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FJUN and RBIL.

Drawdown Indicators

	FJUN	RBIL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-13.26%	-0.52%	-12.74%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.13%	-0.52%	-3.61%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.26%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-13.26%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.17%	-0.51%	+0.34%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.66%	-0.07%	-1.59%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.72%	0.09%	+0.63%

Volatility

FJUN vs. RBIL - Volatility Comparison

FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - June (FJUN) has a higher volatility of 0.44% compared to F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL) at 0.36%. This indicates that FJUN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RBIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FJUN	RBIL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.44%	0.36%	+0.08%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.33%	0.85%	+3.48%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.61%	0.95%	+4.66%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.55%	1.07%	+9.48%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.24%	1.07%	+9.17%

FJUN vs. RBIL - Expense Ratio Comparison

FJUN has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than RBIL's 0.17% expense ratio.

Dividends

FJUN vs. RBIL - Dividend Comparison

FJUN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RBIL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.38%.

Position	TTM	2025
FJUN FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - June	0.00%	0.00%
RBIL F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF	4.38%	3.65%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FJUN and RBIL in my portfolio?

FJUN and RBIL have a correlation of -0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FJUN or RBIL?

FJUN has higher volatility (0.44%) compared to RBIL (0.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FJUN dropped -13.26% vs RBIL's -0.52%.

Which ETF is better, FJUN or RBIL?

On 1-year performance, FJUN leads with 14.16% vs 3.95% for RBIL. On fees, RBIL is cheaper at 0.17% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FJUN or RBIL?

Over the 1-year period, FJUN has performed better with a 14.16% return vs 3.95%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FJUN or RBIL?

RBIL is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for FJUN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FJUN or RBIL?

RBIL has the higher dividend yield at 4.38%, compared with 0.00% for FJUN.

What is the main difference between FJUN and RBIL?

FJUN is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while RBIL is Inflation-Protected Bonds. FJUN tracks Cboe S&P 500 Buffer Protect Index June, while RBIL tracks Bloomberg US Ultrashort TIPS 1-13 Months Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and F/m. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for FJUN and 0.17% for RBIL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RBIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.18 vs 2.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.