PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FJTMX vs. FRQIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FJTMX vs. FRQIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Freedom Blend 2030 Fund Class C (FJTMX) and Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class I (FRQIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FJTMX achieves a 7.92% return, which is significantly higher than FRQIX's 3.60% return.


FJTMX

1D
-0.67%
1M
-0.60%
6M
7.92%
YTD
7.92%
1Y
15.61%
3Y*
12.75%
5Y*
5.28%
10Y*

FRQIX

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.42%
6M
3.60%
YTD
3.60%
1Y
7.95%
3Y*
7.40%
5Y*
2.72%
10Y*
5.14%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FJTMX vs. FRQIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FJTMX
Fidelity Advisor Freedom Blend 2030 Fund Class C
7.92%15.84%9.24%14.18%-18.37%10.03%14.02%21.38%-9.73%
FRQIX
Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class I
3.60%9.97%4.48%8.52%-12.39%3.82%9.58%12.63%-3.91%

Correlation

The correlation between FJTMX and FRQIX is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.89

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 31, 2018

0.88

The correlation between FJTMX and FRQIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FJTMX vs. FRQIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FJTMX
FJTMX Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
FJTMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FJTMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
FJTMX Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
FJTMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
FJTMX Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

FRQIX
FRQIX Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
FRQIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FRQIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
FRQIX Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
FRQIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
FRQIX Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FJTMX vs. FRQIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Freedom Blend 2030 Fund Class C (FJTMX) and Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class I (FRQIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FJTMXFRQIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.41

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.38

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.29

2.39

-0.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.59

9.97

-0.39

FJTMX vs. FRQIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FJTMX Sharpe Ratio is 1.66, which is comparable to the FRQIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FJTMX and FRQIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FJTMX vs. FRQIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FJTMX drawdown since its inception was -25.37%, smaller than the maximum FRQIX drawdown of -38.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FJTMX and FRQIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FJTMXFRQIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.37%

-38.01%

+12.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.88%

-3.43%

-3.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.27%

-5.21%

-5.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.37%

-17.04%

-8.33%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-17.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.89%

-0.42%

-0.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.68%

-4.42%

-1.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.64%

0.82%

+0.82%

Volatility

FJTMX vs. FRQIX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Freedom Blend 2030 Fund Class C (FJTMX) has a higher volatility of 4.23% compared to Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class I (FRQIX) at 1.59%. This indicates that FJTMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FRQIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FJTMXFRQIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.23%

1.59%

+2.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.17%

3.66%

+4.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.49%

4.32%

+5.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.96%

5.60%

+5.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.33%

5.28%

+7.05%

FJTMX vs. FRQIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FJTMX has a 1.46% expense ratio, which is higher than FRQIX's 0.46% expense ratio.


Dividends

FJTMX vs. FRQIX - Dividend Comparison

FJTMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.90%, less than FRQIX's 3.22% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FJTMX
Fidelity Advisor Freedom Blend 2030 Fund Class C
2.90%2.18%2.68%1.41%4.55%6.31%3.96%2.50%2.67%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FRQIX
Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class I
3.22%3.14%2.97%2.75%5.01%6.00%3.51%3.14%5.60%16.32%2.43%4.08%

Frequently Asked Questions


FJTMX and FRQIX have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FJTMX has higher volatility (4.23%) compared to FRQIX (1.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FJTMX dropped -25.37% vs FRQIX's -38.01%.

FRQIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.90 vs 1.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FJTMX and FRQIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer