FJRLX vs. FSRRX

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

FJRLX (Fidelity Limited Term Bond Fund) and FSRRX (Fidelity Strategic Real Return Fund) are both mutual funds - FJRLX is a Total Bond Market fund managed by Fidelity, while FSRRX is a Diversified Portfolio fund managed by Fidelity. Over the past 10 years, FJRLX returned 2.26%/yr vs 5.49%/yr for FSRRX. Their 0.22 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. FJRLX charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for FSRRX.

Performance

FJRLX vs. FSRRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Limited Term Bond Fund (FJRLX) and Fidelity Strategic Real Return Fund (FSRRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FJRLX achieves a 0.45% return, which is significantly lower than FSRRX's 8.37% return. Over the past 10 years, FJRLX has underperformed FSRRX with an annualized return of 2.26%, while FSRRX has yielded a comparatively higher 5.49% annualized return.

FJRLX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -0.43%
• 6M: 0.11%
• YTD: 0.45%
• 1Y: 2.75%
• 3Y*: 5.12%
• 5Y*: 2.00%
• 10Y*: 2.26%
• ALL TIME*: 2.26%

FSRRX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 2.05%
• 6M: 4.71%
• YTD: 8.37%
• 1Y: 14.75%
• 3Y*: 8.64%
• 5Y*: 5.82%
• 10Y*: 5.49%
• ALL TIME*: 4.03%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FJRLX Fidelity Limited Term Bond Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
FSRRX Fidelity Strategic Real Return Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

FJRLX vs. FSRRX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FJRLX Fidelity Limited Term Bond Fund	0.45%	6.70%	4.62%	6.26%	-6.22%	-1.46%	5.16%	6.04%	0.71%	1.89%
FSRRX Fidelity Strategic Real Return Fund	8.37%	10.45%	5.84%	4.59%	-3.34%	15.84%	3.74%	10.48%	-3.99%	3.00%

Correlation

The correlation between FJRLX and FSRRX is 0.13, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.13
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.28
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.27
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.23
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 8, 2013	0.22

The correlation between FJRLX and FSRRX shifts across timeframes, from 0.13 (1 year) to 0.28 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

FJRLX vs. FSRRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FJRLX

FJRLX Risk / Return Rank: 73
FJRLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
FJRLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
FJRLX Omega Ratio Rank: 79
FJRLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
FJRLX Martin Ratio Rank: 64

FSRRX

FSRRX Risk / Return Rank: 95
FSRRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
FSRRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
FSRRX Omega Ratio Rank: 94
FSRRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
FSRRX Martin Ratio Rank: 94

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FJRLX vs. FSRRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Limited Term Bond Fund (FJRLX) and Fidelity Strategic Real Return Fund (FSRRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FJRLX	FSRRX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.66	2.92	-1.26
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.73	4.02	-1.29
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	1.57	-0.22
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.19	4.14	-1.96
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.93	14.82	-6.89

FJRLX vs. FSRRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FJRLX Sharpe Ratio is 1.66, which is lower than the FSRRX Sharpe Ratio of 2.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FJRLX and FSRRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FJRLX vs. FSRRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FJRLX drawdown since its inception was -9.89%, smaller than the maximum FSRRX drawdown of -33.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FJRLX and FSRRX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FJRLX	FSRRX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-9.89%	-33.42%	+23.53%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.63%	-3.42%	+1.79%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-1.63%	-5.80%	+4.17%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-9.71%	-12.78%	+3.07%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-9.89%	-19.93%	+10.04%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.53%	-1.01%	+0.48%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.33%	-4.20%	+2.87%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.45%	0.95%	-0.50%

Volatility

FJRLX vs. FSRRX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Limited Term Bond Fund (FJRLX) is 0.45%, while Fidelity Strategic Real Return Fund (FSRRX) has a volatility of 1.25%. This indicates that FJRLX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSRRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FJRLX	FSRRX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.45%	1.25%	-0.80%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.74%	3.77%	-2.03%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.14%	4.90%	-2.76%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	2.78%	6.87%	-4.09%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	2.41%	6.72%	-4.31%

FJRLX vs. FSRRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FJRLX has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than FSRRX's 0.70% expense ratio.

Dividends

FJRLX vs. FSRRX - Dividend Comparison

FJRLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.79%, less than FSRRX's 4.58% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FJRLX Fidelity Limited Term Bond Fund	3.79%	3.93%	3.08%	2.38%	1.26%	1.25%	2.38%	2.44%	2.29%	1.79%	1.88%	1.60%
FSRRX Fidelity Strategic Real Return Fund	4.58%	4.68%	4.82%	5.29%	7.31%	5.35%	2.25%	3.05%	9.39%	1.57%	2.34%	1.75%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FJRLX and FSRRX in my portfolio?

FJRLX and FSRRX have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FJRLX or FSRRX?

FSRRX has higher volatility (1.25%) compared to FJRLX (0.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FJRLX dropped -9.89% vs FSRRX's -33.42%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FSRRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.92 vs 1.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.