FJPIX vs. RMBPX

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

FJPIX (Fidelity Advisor Japan Fund Class I) and RMBPX (RMB Japan Fund) are both Japan Equities funds. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FJPIX charges 1.04%/yr vs 1.30%/yr for RMBPX.

Performance

FJPIX vs. RMBPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Japan Fund Class I (FJPIX) and RMB Japan Fund (RMBPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

FJPIX

• 1D: 0.60%
• 1M: 7.03%
• YTD: 25.17%
• 6M: 24.56%
• 1Y: 44.58%
• 3Y*: 22.05%
• 5Y*: 10.22%
• 10Y*: 11.54%

RMBPX

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FJPIX vs. RMBPX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
FJPIX Fidelity Advisor Japan Fund Class I	25.17%	31.61%	7.29%	15.88%	-22.22%	3.18%	25.56%	25.71%	-18.84%
RMBPX RMB Japan Fund	0.00%	-0.24%	-14.03%	19.33%	-14.50%	-2.65%	13.06%	17.64%	-17.62%

Correlation

The correlation between FJPIX and RMBPX is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.61
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.75
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 16, 2018	0.78

The correlation between FJPIX and RMBPX shifts across timeframes, from 0.61 (3 years) to 0.78 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

FJPIX vs. RMBPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FJPIX

FJPIX Risk / Return Rank: 60
FJPIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
FJPIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
FJPIX Omega Ratio Rank: 49
FJPIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
FJPIX Martin Ratio Rank: 72

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FJPIX vs. RMBPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Japan Fund Class I (FJPIX) and RMB Japan Fund (RMBPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FJPIX	RMBPX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.13	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.87	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.52	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.45	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FJPIX	RMBPX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.13	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.51	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.63	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.46	—	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	FJPIX	RMBPX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-36.13%	—	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.77%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.16%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-36.13%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-36.13%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.06%	—	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.65%	—	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.34%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	FJPIX	RMBPX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.07%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.36%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.17%	—	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.96%	—	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.27%	—	—

FJPIX vs. RMBPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FJPIX has a 1.04% expense ratio, which is lower than RMBPX's 1.30% expense ratio.

Dividends

FJPIX vs. RMBPX - Dividend Comparison

FJPIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.81%, while RMBPX has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FJPIX Fidelity Advisor Japan Fund Class I	7.81%	9.77%	4.27%	3.69%	0.00%	10.54%	1.91%	1.27%	0.32%	0.23%	1.20%	0.60%
RMBPX RMB Japan Fund	0.00%	0.00%	3.28%	4.43%	1.04%	8.11%	0.29%	1.15%	0.36%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FJPIX and RMBPX in my portfolio?

FJPIX and RMBPX have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.