PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FJPIX vs. FIQLX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FJPIX vs. FIQLX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Japan Fund Class I (FJPIX) and Fidelity Advisor Japan Fund Class Z (FIQLX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FJPIX having a 29.56% return and FIQLX slightly higher at 29.63%.


FJPIX

1D
1.80%
1M
5.27%
YTD
29.56%
6M
29.95%
1Y
51.72%
3Y*
22.66%
5Y*
11.51%
10Y*
11.91%

FIQLX

1D
1.79%
1M
5.27%
YTD
29.63%
6M
30.03%
1Y
51.94%
3Y*
22.83%
5Y*
11.65%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FJPIX vs. FIQLX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FJPIX
Fidelity Advisor Japan Fund Class I
29.56%31.61%7.29%15.88%-22.22%3.18%25.56%25.71%-11.46%
FIQLX
Fidelity Advisor Japan Fund Class Z
29.63%31.84%7.43%16.09%-22.16%3.32%25.58%25.93%-11.46%

Correlation

The correlation between FJPIX and FIQLX is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.00

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

1.00

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2018

1.00

The correlation between FJPIX and FIQLX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 1.00 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FJPIX vs. FIQLX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FJPIX
FJPIX Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
FJPIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FJPIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
FJPIX Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
FJPIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
FJPIX Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

FIQLX
FIQLX Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
FIQLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIQLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIQLX Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
FIQLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIQLX Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FJPIX vs. FIQLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Japan Fund Class I (FJPIX) and Fidelity Advisor Japan Fund Class Z (FIQLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FJPIXFIQLXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.39

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.85

3.87

-0.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.32

14.40

-0.08

FJPIX vs. FIQLX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FJPIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.22, which is comparable to the FIQLX Sharpe Ratio of 2.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FJPIX and FIQLX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FJPIX vs. FIQLX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FJPIX drawdown since its inception was -36.13%, roughly equal to the maximum FIQLX drawdown of -36.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FJPIX and FIQLX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FJPIXFIQLXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.13%

-36.13%

0.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.77%

-12.73%

-0.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.16%

-19.14%

-0.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.13%

-36.13%

0.00%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.63%

-10.24%

+0.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.43%

3.42%

+0.01%

Volatility

FJPIX vs. FIQLX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Japan Fund Class I (FJPIX) and Fidelity Advisor Japan Fund Class Z (FIQLX) have volatilities of 7.94% and 7.95%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FJPIXFIQLXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.94%

7.95%

-0.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.53%

17.51%

+0.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.13%

22.11%

+0.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.18%

20.18%

0.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.37%

19.95%

-1.58%

FJPIX vs. FIQLX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FJPIX has a 1.04% expense ratio, which is higher than FIQLX's 0.96% expense ratio.


Dividends

FJPIX vs. FIQLX - Dividend Comparison

FJPIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.54%, less than FIQLX's 7.75% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FIQLX
Fidelity Advisor Japan Fund Class Z
7.75%10.04%5.04%3.88%0.00%11.89%1.97%1.35%0.48%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FJPIX
Fidelity Advisor Japan Fund Class I
7.54%9.77%4.27%3.69%0.00%10.54%1.91%1.27%0.32%0.23%1.20%0.60%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 1.00, FJPIX and FIQLX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FIQLX has higher volatility (7.95%) compared to FJPIX (7.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FJPIX dropped -36.13% vs FIQLX's -36.13%.

FIQLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.23 vs 2.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FJPIX and FIQLX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer