FJPCX vs. QQQ

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

FJPCX (Fidelity Advisor Japan Fund Class C) and QQQ (Invesco QQQ ETF) are both funds - FJPCX is a Japan Equities fund managed by Fidelity, while QQQ is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Over the past 10 years, FJPCX returned 9.58%/yr vs 20.44%/yr for QQQ. Their 0.60 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. FJPCX charges 2.09%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for QQQ.

Performance

FJPCX vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Japan Fund Class C (FJPCX) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FJPCX achieves a 20.64% return, which is significantly higher than QQQ's 12.26% return. Over the past 10 years, FJPCX has underperformed QQQ with an annualized return of 9.58%, while QQQ has yielded a comparatively higher 20.44% annualized return.

FJPCX

• 1D: 4.49%
• 1M: -2.21%
• 6M: 12.01%
• YTD: 20.64%
• 1Y: 34.92%
• 3Y*: 18.68%
• 5Y*: 8.69%
• 10Y*: 9.58%
• ALL TIME*: 6.93%

QQQ

• 1D: 0.65%
• 1M: -3.45%
• 6M: 10.89%
• YTD: 12.26%
• 1Y: 24.81%
• 3Y*: 22.29%
• 5Y*: 14.23%
• 10Y*: 20.44%
• ALL TIME*: 10.64%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FJPCX Fidelity Advisor Japan Fund Class C	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF	$30.32B	$28.40B	$31.45B

FJPCX vs. QQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FJPCX Fidelity Advisor Japan Fund Class C	20.64%	30.33%	6.28%	14.73%	-23.02%	2.12%	24.21%	24.42%	-15.61%	28.87%
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF	12.26%	20.77%	25.58%	54.86%	-32.58%	27.42%	48.62%	38.96%	-0.13%	32.66%

Correlation

The correlation between FJPCX and QQQ is 0.68, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.68
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.61
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.63
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.61
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 17, 2010	0.60

The correlation between FJPCX and QQQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.60 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FJPCX vs. QQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FJPCX

FJPCX Risk / Return Rank: 66
FJPCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
FJPCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
FJPCX Omega Ratio Rank: 59
FJPCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
FJPCX Martin Ratio Rank: 72

QQQ

QQQ Risk / Return Rank: 49
QQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 47
QQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 46
QQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 45
QQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 53
QQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 52

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FJPCX vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Japan Fund Class C (FJPCX) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FJPCX	QQQ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.51	1.16	+0.35
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.11	1.65	+0.46
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	1.21	+0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.76	1.88	+0.88
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.89	6.00	+2.89

FJPCX vs. QQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FJPCX Sharpe Ratio is 1.51, which is comparable to the QQQ Sharpe Ratio of 1.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FJPCX and QQQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FJPCX vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FJPCX drawdown since its inception was -36.91%, smaller than the maximum QQQ drawdown of -82.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FJPCX and QQQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	FJPCX	QQQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-36.91%	-82.97%	+46.06%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.81%	-11.96%	-0.85%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.64%	-22.77%	+3.13%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-36.91%	-35.12%	-1.79%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-36.91%	-35.12%	-1.79%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.14%	-7.69%	+0.55%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.46%	-32.62%	+22.16%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.97%	3.74%	+0.23%

Volatility

FJPCX vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Japan Fund Class C (FJPCX) has a higher volatility of 8.49% compared to Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) at 6.87%. This indicates that FJPCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FJPCX	QQQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.49%	6.87%	+1.62%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.63%	16.08%	+3.55%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.49%	19.38%	+4.11%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.58%	22.90%	-2.32%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.53%	22.50%	-3.97%

FJPCX vs. QQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

FJPCX has a 2.09% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQ's 0.18% expense ratio.

Dividends

FJPCX vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison

FJPCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.59%, more than QQQ's 0.44% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FJPCX Fidelity Advisor Japan Fund Class C	7.59%	9.16%	3.93%	2.96%	0.00%	10.33%	1.25%	0.22%	0.00%	0.25%	0.00%	0.00%
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF	0.44%	0.45%	0.56%	0.62%	0.80%	0.43%	0.55%	0.74%	0.91%	0.84%	1.06%	0.99%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FJPCX and QQQ in my portfolio?

FJPCX and QQQ have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FJPCX or QQQ?

FJPCX has higher volatility (8.49%) compared to QQQ (6.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FJPCX dropped -36.91% vs QQQ's -82.97%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FJPCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.51 vs 1.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.