FJP vs. MJSC
FJP (First Trust Japan AlphaDEX Fund) and MJSC (MUFG Japan Small Cap Active ETF) are both Japan Equities funds. FJP is passively managed, while MJSC is actively managed. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FJP charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for MJSC.
Performance
FJP vs. MJSC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FJP achieves a 14.36% return, which is significantly lower than MJSC's 22.08% return.
FJP
- 1D
- -3.66%
- 1M
- 0.74%
- YTD
- 14.36%
- 6M
- 13.78%
- 1Y
- 34.76%
- 3Y*
- 21.09%
- 5Y*
- 11.07%
- 10Y*
- 7.86%
MJSC
- 1D
- -3.44%
- 1M
- -0.52%
- YTD
- 22.08%
- 6M
- 21.25%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FJP vs. MJSC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FJP First Trust Japan AlphaDEX Fund | 14.36% | 2.23% |
MJSC MUFG Japan Small Cap Active ETF | 22.08% | -0.05% |
Correlation
The correlation between FJP and MJSC is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 17, 2025 | 0.87 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FJP vs. MJSC — Risk / Return Rank
FJP
MJSC
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
FJP vs. MJSC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Japan AlphaDEX Fund (FJP) and MUFG Japan Small Cap Active ETF (MJSC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FJP | MJSC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.42 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.07 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FJP vs. MJSC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FJP drawdown since its inception was -41.51%, which is greater than MJSC's maximum drawdown of -12.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FJP and MJSC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FJP | MJSC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.51% | -12.63% | -28.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.43% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.02% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.88% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.51% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.28% | -3.44% | -2.84% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.44% | -2.94% | -8.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.93% | — | — |
Volatility
FJP vs. MJSC - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FJP | MJSC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.15% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.96% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.22% | 20.85% | +0.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.54% | 20.85% | -0.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.91% | 20.85% | -1.94% |
FJP vs. MJSC - Expense Ratio Comparison
FJP has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is lower than MJSC's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
FJP vs. MJSC - Dividend Comparison
FJP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.49%, more than MJSC's 0.54% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FJP First Trust Japan AlphaDEX Fund | 2.49% | 2.68% | 3.18% | 3.49% | 2.21% | 2.43% | 0.99% | 2.80% | 1.54% | 1.29% | 1.46% | 0.85% |
MJSC MUFG Japan Small Cap Active ETF | 0.54% | 0.66% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FJP and MJSC have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FJP is cheaper at 0.80% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FJP is cheaper with a 0.80% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for MJSC.
FJP has the higher dividend yield at 2.49%, compared with 0.54% for MJSC.
They also come from different issuers: First Trust and MUFG. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for FJP and 0.85% for MJSC.
Find the right allocation for FJP and MJSC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer