PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FJLMX vs. PLTZX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FJLMX vs. PLTZX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Freedom Blend 2030 Fund Class Z (FJLMX) and Principal LifeTime 2060 Fund (PLTZX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FJLMX achieves a 9.29% return, which is significantly higher than PLTZX's 8.66% return.


FJLMX

1D
-0.22%
1M
2.08%
YTD
9.29%
6M
9.01%
1Y
20.39%
3Y*
15.00%
5Y*
7.33%
10Y*

PLTZX

1D
-0.29%
1M
1.44%
YTD
8.66%
6M
8.08%
1Y
20.85%
3Y*
18.02%
5Y*
9.03%
10Y*
11.95%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FJLMX vs. PLTZX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FJLMX
Fidelity Advisor Freedom Blend 2030 Fund Class Z
9.29%17.01%11.33%15.37%-16.05%11.27%15.26%22.64%-8.85%
PLTZX
Principal LifeTime 2060 Fund
8.66%17.76%16.89%20.36%-18.81%18.12%16.60%27.54%-13.85%

Correlation

The correlation between FJLMX and PLTZX is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 4, 2018

0.94

The correlation between FJLMX and PLTZX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FJLMX vs. PLTZX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FJLMX
FJLMX Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
FJLMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FJLMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
FJLMX Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
FJLMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
FJLMX Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

PLTZX
PLTZX Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
PLTZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PLTZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
PLTZX Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
PLTZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
PLTZX Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FJLMX vs. PLTZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Freedom Blend 2030 Fund Class Z (FJLMX) and Principal LifeTime 2060 Fund (PLTZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FJLMXPLTZXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.50

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.72

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.32

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.10

2.52

+0.58

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.21

11.08

+2.13

FJLMX vs. PLTZX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FJLMX Sharpe Ratio is 2.25, which is comparable to the PLTZX Sharpe Ratio of 1.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FJLMX and PLTZX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FJLMX vs. PLTZX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FJLMX drawdown since its inception was -24.65%, smaller than the maximum PLTZX drawdown of -34.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FJLMX and PLTZX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FJLMXPLTZXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.65%

-34.01%

+9.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.80%

-8.70%

+1.90%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.07%

-15.73%

+5.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.55%

-26.79%

+2.24%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.22%

-0.92%

+0.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.91%

-4.61%

-0.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.59%

1.98%

-0.39%

Volatility

FJLMX vs. PLTZX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Freedom Blend 2030 Fund Class Z (FJLMX) is 3.93%, while Principal LifeTime 2060 Fund (PLTZX) has a volatility of 4.81%. This indicates that FJLMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PLTZX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FJLMXPLTZXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.93%

4.81%

-0.88%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.99%

10.31%

-2.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.39%

12.51%

-3.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.03%

15.57%

-4.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.37%

16.04%

-3.67%

FJLMX vs. PLTZX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FJLMX has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is higher than PLTZX's 0.01% expense ratio.


Dividends

FJLMX vs. PLTZX - Dividend Comparison

FJLMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.63%, less than PLTZX's 7.67% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FJLMX
Fidelity Advisor Freedom Blend 2030 Fund Class Z
3.63%3.01%4.31%2.34%7.10%7.25%4.57%3.21%2.92%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PLTZX
Principal LifeTime 2060 Fund
7.67%8.33%7.85%4.12%8.44%5.29%3.60%5.86%5.75%2.73%3.48%3.29%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, FJLMX and PLTZX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

PLTZX has higher volatility (4.81%) compared to FJLMX (3.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FJLMX dropped -24.65% vs PLTZX's -34.01%.

FJLMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.25 vs 1.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FJLMX and PLTZX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer