FJAHX vs. FSPGX
FJAHX (Fidelity Advisor Freedom Blend 2025 Fund Class A) and FSPGX (Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund) are both mutual funds - FJAHX is a Target Retirement Date fund managed by Fidelity, while FSPGX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Fidelity. Over the past 5 years, FJAHX returned 5.02%/yr vs 13.13%/yr for FSPGX. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FJAHX charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for FSPGX.
Performance
FJAHX vs. FSPGX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FJAHX achieves a 7.55% return, which is significantly higher than FSPGX's 4.22% return.
FJAHX
- 1D
- -0.61%
- 1M
- -0.46%
- 6M
- 7.55%
- YTD
- 7.55%
- 1Y
- 14.97%
- 3Y*
- 11.97%
- 5Y*
- 5.02%
- 10Y*
- —
FSPGX
- 1D
- -1.05%
- 1M
- -4.04%
- 6M
- 4.22%
- YTD
- 4.22%
- 1Y
- 16.71%
- 3Y*
- 22.13%
- 5Y*
- 13.13%
- 10Y*
- —
FJAHX vs. FSPGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FJAHX Fidelity Advisor Freedom Blend 2025 Fund Class A | 7.55% | 15.58% | 7.56% | 13.80% | -17.45% | 9.41% | 13.90% | 19.79% | -7.88% |
FSPGX Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund | 4.22% | 18.54% | 33.27% | 42.77% | -29.17% | 27.57% | 38.46% | 36.38% | -15.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between FJAHX and FSPGX is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 31, 2018 | 0.82 |
The correlation between FJAHX and FSPGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FJAHX vs. FSPGX — Risk / Return Rank
FJAHX
FSPGX
FJAHX vs. FSPGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Freedom Blend 2025 Fund Class A (FJAHX) and Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund (FSPGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FJAHX | FSPGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.66 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.92 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.19 | +0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.37 | 1.10 | +1.27 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.04 | 3.52 | +6.52 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FJAHX vs. FSPGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FJAHX drawdown since its inception was -24.18%, smaller than the maximum FSPGX drawdown of -32.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FJAHX and FSPGX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FJAHX | FSPGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.18% | -32.66% | +8.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.40% | -16.17% | +9.77% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -8.97% | -23.32% | +14.35% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.18% | -32.66% | +8.48% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.84% | -4.40% | +3.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.18% | -6.36% | +1.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.50% | 5.03% | -3.53% |
Volatility
FJAHX vs. FSPGX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Freedom Blend 2025 Fund Class A (FJAHX) is 3.91%, while Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund (FSPGX) has a volatility of 6.94%. This indicates that FJAHX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSPGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FJAHX | FSPGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.91% | 6.94% | -3.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.51% | 13.04% | -5.53% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.70% | 16.52% | -7.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.12% | 21.68% | -11.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.93% | 21.57% | -10.64% |
FJAHX vs. FSPGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FJAHX has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than FSPGX's 0.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
FJAHX vs. FSPGX - Dividend Comparison
FJAHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.02%, more than FSPGX's 0.37% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FJAHX Fidelity Advisor Freedom Blend 2025 Fund Class A | 3.02% | 2.19% | 2.01% | 2.18% | 5.31% | 6.54% | 4.14% | 2.91% | 2.12% | 0.00% |
FSPGX Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund | 0.37% | 0.34% | 0.37% | 0.73% | 0.86% | 2.22% | 1.76% | 1.04% | 1.32% | 0.22% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FJAHX and FSPGX have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FSPGX has higher volatility (6.94%) compared to FJAHX (3.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FJAHX dropped -24.18% vs FSPGX's -32.66%.
FJAHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.74 vs 1.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FJAHX and FSPGX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer