PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FJAHX vs. FRQAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FJAHX vs. FRQAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Freedom Blend 2025 Fund Class A (FJAHX) and Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class A (FRQAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FJAHX achieves a 7.55% return, which is significantly higher than FRQAX's 3.51% return.


FJAHX

1D
-0.61%
1M
-0.46%
6M
7.55%
YTD
7.55%
1Y
14.97%
3Y*
11.97%
5Y*
5.02%
10Y*

FRQAX

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.43%
6M
3.51%
YTD
3.51%
1Y
7.70%
3Y*
7.10%
5Y*
2.44%
10Y*
4.87%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FJAHX vs. FRQAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FJAHX
Fidelity Advisor Freedom Blend 2025 Fund Class A
7.55%15.58%7.56%13.80%-17.45%9.41%13.90%19.79%-7.88%
FRQAX
Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class A
3.51%9.54%4.21%8.24%-12.60%3.56%9.32%12.33%-3.98%

Correlation

The correlation between FJAHX and FRQAX is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 31, 2018

0.91

The correlation between FJAHX and FRQAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FJAHX vs. FRQAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FJAHX
FJAHX Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
FJAHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FJAHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
FJAHX Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
FJAHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
FJAHX Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

FRQAX
FRQAX Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
FRQAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FRQAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
FRQAX Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
FRQAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
FRQAX Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FJAHX vs. FRQAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Freedom Blend 2025 Fund Class A (FJAHX) and Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class A (FRQAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FJAHXFRQAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.37

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.37

2.30

+0.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.04

9.55

+0.49

FJAHX vs. FRQAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FJAHX Sharpe Ratio is 1.74, which is comparable to the FRQAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FJAHX and FRQAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FJAHX vs. FRQAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FJAHX drawdown since its inception was -24.18%, smaller than the maximum FRQAX drawdown of -38.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FJAHX and FRQAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FJAHXFRQAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.18%

-38.22%

+14.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.40%

-3.46%

-2.94%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.97%

-5.27%

-3.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.18%

-17.24%

-6.94%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-17.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.84%

-0.43%

-0.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.18%

-4.56%

-0.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.50%

0.83%

+0.67%

Volatility

FJAHX vs. FRQAX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Freedom Blend 2025 Fund Class A (FJAHX) has a higher volatility of 3.91% compared to Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class A (FRQAX) at 1.58%. This indicates that FJAHX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FRQAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FJAHXFRQAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.91%

1.58%

+2.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.51%

3.67%

+3.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.70%

4.33%

+4.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.12%

5.59%

+4.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.93%

5.28%

+5.65%

FJAHX vs. FRQAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FJAHX has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is lower than FRQAX's 0.71% expense ratio.


Dividends

FJAHX vs. FRQAX - Dividend Comparison

FJAHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.02%, more than FRQAX's 2.99% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FJAHX
Fidelity Advisor Freedom Blend 2025 Fund Class A
3.02%2.19%2.01%2.18%5.31%6.54%4.14%2.91%2.12%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FRQAX
Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class A
2.99%2.72%2.71%2.46%4.74%5.76%3.26%2.93%5.33%16.05%2.18%3.81%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.90, FJAHX and FRQAX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FJAHX has higher volatility (3.91%) compared to FRQAX (1.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FJAHX dropped -24.18% vs FRQAX's -38.22%.

FRQAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.84 vs 1.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FJAHX and FRQAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer