FIYY vs. TYLG
FIYY (GraniteShares YieldBOOST 20Y+ Treasuries ETF) and TYLG (Global X Information Technology Covered Call & Growth ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. FIYY is actively managed, while TYLG is passively managed. Their 0.24 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. FIYY charges 1.07%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for TYLG.
Performance
FIYY vs. TYLG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
FIYY
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 0.79%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
TYLG
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- 1.14%
- 6M
- 25.43%
- YTD
- 21.43%
- 1Y
- 35.40%
- 3Y*
- 23.15%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 26.38%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $2.87K | $1.63K | $1.40K | |
| $136.82K | $132.54K | $141.92K |
FIYY vs. TYLG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
FIYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST 20Y+ Treasuries ETF | -1.15% |
TYLG Global X Information Technology Covered Call & Growth ETF | 10.32% |
Correlation
The correlation between FIYY and TYLG is 0.24, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2026 | 0.24 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FIYY vs. TYLG — Risk / Return Rank
FIYY
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
TYLG
FIYY vs. TYLG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares YieldBOOST 20Y+ Treasuries ETF (FIYY) and Global X Information Technology Covered Call & Growth ETF (TYLG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FIYY | TYLG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.32 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.30 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 10.87 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FIYY vs. TYLG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FIYY drawdown since its inception was -2.94%, smaller than the maximum TYLG drawdown of -24.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIYY and TYLG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FIYY | TYLG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.94% | -24.01% | +21.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -10.78% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -24.01% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.27% | -2.51% | +1.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.58% | -2.82% | +1.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.27% | — |
Volatility
FIYY vs. TYLG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FIYY | TYLG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 8.21% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 16.80% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.65% | 19.37% | -13.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.65% | 19.78% | -14.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.65% | 19.78% | -14.13% |
FIYY vs. TYLG - Expense Ratio Comparison
FIYY has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than TYLG's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
FIYY vs. TYLG - Dividend Comparison
FIYY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.24%, less than TYLG's 8.51% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FIYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST 20Y+ Treasuries ETF | 1.24% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TYLG Global X Information Technology Covered Call & Growth ETF | 8.51% | 7.66% | 7.24% | 11.89% | 0.51% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FIYY and TYLG have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TYLG is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TYLG is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for FIYY.
TYLG has the higher dividend yield at 8.51%, compared with 1.24% for FIYY.
They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Global X. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for FIYY and 0.60% for TYLG.
Find the right allocation for FIYY and TYLG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer