FIYY vs. ILTB
FIYY (GraniteShares YieldBOOST 20Y+ Treasuries ETF) and ILTB (iShares Core 10+ Year USD Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FIYY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by GraniteShares, while ILTB is a Long-Term Bond fund tracking the Bloomberg U.S. Universal 10+ Year Index (USD). FIYY is actively managed, while ILTB is passively managed. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FIYY charges 1.07%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for ILTB.
Performance
FIYY vs. ILTB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
FIYY
- 1D
- -0.00%
- 1M
- -0.43%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ILTB
- 1D
- 0.17%
- 1M
- -1.55%
- 6M
- -1.04%
- YTD
- -0.47%
- 1Y
- 5.12%
- 3Y*
- 2.17%
- 5Y*
- -3.90%
- 10Y*
- 0.75%
FIYY vs. ILTB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
FIYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST 20Y+ Treasuries ETF | -1.79% |
ILTB iShares Core 10+ Year USD Bond ETF | 0.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between FIYY and ILTB is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2026 | 0.56 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FIYY vs. ILTB — Risk / Return Rank
FIYY
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
ILTB
FIYY vs. ILTB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares YieldBOOST 20Y+ Treasuries ETF (FIYY) and iShares Core 10+ Year USD Bond ETF (ILTB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FIYY | ILTB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.12 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 0.95 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 2.26 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FIYY vs. ILTB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FIYY drawdown since its inception was -2.51%, smaller than the maximum ILTB drawdown of -36.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIYY and ILTB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FIYY | ILTB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.51% | -36.88% | +34.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -5.42% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -14.60% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -35.22% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -36.88% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.91% | -21.88% | +19.97% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.51% | -10.00% | +8.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.27% | — |
Volatility
FIYY vs. ILTB - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FIYY | ILTB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.11% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 5.84% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.90% | 7.64% | -2.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.90% | 12.60% | -7.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.90% | 11.53% | -6.63% |
FIYY vs. ILTB - Expense Ratio Comparison
FIYY has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than ILTB's 0.06% expense ratio.
Dividends
FIYY vs. ILTB - Dividend Comparison
FIYY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.17%, less than ILTB's 5.01% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FIYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST 20Y+ Treasuries ETF | 1.17% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ILTB iShares Core 10+ Year USD Bond ETF | 5.01% | 4.83% | 4.91% | 4.38% | 4.31% | 3.04% | 3.32% | 3.45% | 4.13% | 3.97% | 3.99% | 4.20% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FIYY and ILTB have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ILTB is cheaper at 0.06% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ILTB is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for FIYY.
ILTB has the higher dividend yield at 5.01%, compared with 1.17% for FIYY.
FIYY is categorized as Derivative Income, while ILTB is Long-Term Bond. They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and iShares. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for FIYY and 0.06% for ILTB.
Find the right allocation for FIYY and ILTB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer