FIXT vs. PAWZ

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

FIXT (Procure Disaster Recovery Strategy ETF) and PAWZ (ProShares Pet Care ETF) are both Global Equities funds - FIXT tracks the VettaFi Natural Disaster Response and Mitigation Index while PAWZ tracks the FactSet Pet Care Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, FIXT returned 2.57% vs -6.29% for PAWZ. Their 0.41 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. FIXT charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for PAWZ.

Performance

FIXT vs. PAWZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Procure Disaster Recovery Strategy ETF (FIXT) and ProShares Pet Care ETF (PAWZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FIXT achieves a -0.02% return, which is significantly higher than PAWZ's -6.69% return.

FIXT

• 1D: 0.16%
• 1M: -0.88%
• 6M: -0.36%
• YTD: -0.02%
• 1Y: 2.57%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 4.01%

PAWZ

• 1D: 0.74%
• 1M: 3.67%
• 6M: -7.16%
• YTD: -6.69%
• 1Y: -6.29%
• 3Y*: 0.40%
• 5Y*: -8.84%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 3.74%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FIXT Procure Disaster Recovery Strategy ETF	$753.53K	$1.08M	$852.15K
PAWZ ProShares Pet Care ETF	$109.64K	$90.57K	$271.78K

FIXT vs. PAWZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
FIXT Procure Disaster Recovery Strategy ETF	-0.02%	4.57%
PAWZ ProShares Pet Care ETF	-6.69%	-4.87%

Correlation

The correlation between FIXT and PAWZ is 0.43, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.43
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 16, 2025	0.41

Return for Risk

FIXT vs. PAWZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FIXT

FIXT Risk / Return Rank: 27
FIXT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 29
FIXT Sortino Ratio Rank: 27
FIXT Omega Ratio Rank: 26
FIXT Calmar Ratio Rank: 26
FIXT Martin Ratio Rank: 26

PAWZ

PAWZ Risk / Return Rank: 6
PAWZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6
PAWZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 6
PAWZ Omega Ratio Rank: 6
PAWZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 7
PAWZ Martin Ratio Rank: 7

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FIXT vs. PAWZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Procure Disaster Recovery Strategy ETF (FIXT) and ProShares Pet Care ETF (PAWZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FIXT	PAWZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.72	-0.37	+1.09
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.05	-0.42	+1.47
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.12	0.95	+0.17
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.85	-0.30	+1.15
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.12	-0.60	+2.71

FIXT vs. PAWZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FIXT Sharpe Ratio is 0.72, which is higher than the PAWZ Sharpe Ratio of -0.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FIXT and PAWZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FIXT vs. PAWZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FIXT drawdown since its inception was -3.02%, smaller than the maximum PAWZ drawdown of -50.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIXT and PAWZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	FIXT	PAWZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-3.02%	-50.07%	+47.05%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.02%	-21.10%	+18.08%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-23.12%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-50.07%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.13%	-37.92%	+35.79%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.84%	-22.93%	+22.09%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.21%	10.55%	-9.34%

Volatility

FIXT vs. PAWZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Procure Disaster Recovery Strategy ETF (FIXT) is 1.12%, while ProShares Pet Care ETF (PAWZ) has a volatility of 5.43%. This indicates that FIXT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PAWZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FIXT	PAWZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.12%	5.43%	-4.31%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.69%	13.14%	-10.45%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.58%	17.14%	-13.56%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.76%	20.36%	-16.60%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.76%	21.62%	-17.86%

FIXT vs. PAWZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

FIXT has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than PAWZ's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

FIXT vs. PAWZ - Dividend Comparison

FIXT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.66%, more than PAWZ's 0.68% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
FIXT Procure Disaster Recovery Strategy ETF	5.66%	3.24%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
PAWZ ProShares Pet Care ETF	0.68%	0.81%	0.63%	0.44%	0.54%	0.18%	0.14%	0.35%	0.07%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FIXT and PAWZ in my portfolio?

FIXT and PAWZ have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FIXT or PAWZ?

PAWZ has higher volatility (5.43%) compared to FIXT (1.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIXT dropped -3.02% vs PAWZ's -50.07%.

Which ETF is better, FIXT or PAWZ?

On 1-year performance, FIXT leads with 2.57% vs -6.29% for PAWZ. On fees, PAWZ is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, FIXT has been the lower-risk option at 1.12%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FIXT or PAWZ?

Over the 1-year period, FIXT has performed better with a 2.57% return vs -6.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FIXT or PAWZ?

PAWZ is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for FIXT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FIXT or PAWZ?

FIXT has the higher dividend yield at 5.66%, compared with 0.68% for PAWZ.

What is the main difference between FIXT and PAWZ?

FIXT tracks VettaFi Natural Disaster Response and Mitigation Index, while PAWZ tracks FactSet Pet Care Index. They also come from different issuers: Procure and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for FIXT and 0.50% for PAWZ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FIXT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.72 vs -0.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.