FIXD vs. IMTB
FIXD (First Trust Smith Opportunistic Fixed Income ETF) and IMTB (iShares Core 5-10 Year USD Bond ETF) are both Intermediate Core-Plus Bond funds. FIXD is actively managed, while IMTB is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FIXD returned -0.33%/yr vs 0.58%/yr for IMTB. A 0.80 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FIXD charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for IMTB.
Performance
FIXD vs. IMTB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FIXD achieves a 0.28% return, which is significantly higher than IMTB's 0.14% return.
FIXD
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- 0.34%
- YTD
- 0.28%
- 6M
- 0.18%
- 1Y
- 5.07%
- 3Y*
- 3.90%
- 5Y*
- -0.33%
- 10Y*
- —
IMTB
- 1D
- 0.16%
- 1M
- 0.13%
- YTD
- 0.14%
- 6M
- 0.49%
- 1Y
- 5.66%
- 3Y*
- 4.82%
- 5Y*
- 0.58%
- 10Y*
- —
FIXD vs. IMTB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FIXD First Trust Smith Opportunistic Fixed Income ETF | 0.28% | 7.95% | 0.75% | 5.72% | -15.00% | -1.07% | 8.99% | 10.56% | -0.00% | 3.50% |
IMTB iShares Core 5-10 Year USD Bond ETF | 0.14% | 8.88% | 1.94% | 6.10% | -12.75% | -1.41% | 6.25% | 8.62% | -0.45% | 4.38% |
Correlation
The correlation between FIXD and IMTB is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 16, 2017 | 0.80 |
The correlation between FIXD and IMTB shifts across timeframes, from 0.80 (all time) to 0.94 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FIXD vs. IMTB — Risk / Return Rank
FIXD
IMTB
FIXD vs. IMTB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Smith Opportunistic Fixed Income ETF (FIXD) and iShares Core 5-10 Year USD Bond ETF (IMTB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FIXD | IMTB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.19 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.35 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.25 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.59 | 1.99 | -0.40 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.76 | 6.13 | -1.38 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FIXD | IMTB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.22 | 1.41 | -0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.05 | 0.09 | -0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.35 | 0.36 | -0.01 |
Drawdowns
FIXD vs. IMTB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FIXD drawdown since its inception was -20.44%, which is greater than IMTB's maximum drawdown of -18.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIXD and IMTB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FIXD | IMTB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.44% | -18.15% | -2.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.21% | -2.86% | -0.35% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.97% | -6.80% | -0.17% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.44% | -18.11% | -2.33% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.44% | -1.58% | -1.86% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.50% | -4.13% | -1.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.07% | 0.92% | +0.15% |
Volatility
FIXD vs. IMTB - Volatility Comparison
First Trust Smith Opportunistic Fixed Income ETF (FIXD) has a higher volatility of 1.62% compared to iShares Core 5-10 Year USD Bond ETF (IMTB) at 1.46%. This indicates that FIXD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IMTB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FIXD | IMTB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.62% | 1.46% | +0.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.13% | 3.02% | +0.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.21% | 4.05% | +0.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.58% | 6.28% | +0.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.83% | 5.18% | +0.65% |
FIXD vs. IMTB - Expense Ratio Comparison
FIXD has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than IMTB's 0.06% expense ratio.
Dividends
FIXD vs. IMTB - Dividend Comparison
FIXD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.69%, more than IMTB's 4.52% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FIXD First Trust Smith Opportunistic Fixed Income ETF | 4.69% | 4.50% | 4.56% | 3.93% | 3.07% | 1.74% | 3.14% | 5.10% | 2.81% | 1.95% | 0.00% |
IMTB iShares Core 5-10 Year USD Bond ETF | 4.52% | 4.40% | 4.42% | 4.13% | 2.90% | 2.49% | 2.63% | 2.91% | 3.04% | 2.75% | 0.40% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, FIXD and IMTB move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
FIXD has higher volatility (1.62%) compared to IMTB (1.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIXD dropped -20.44% vs IMTB's -18.15%.
On 5-year performance, IMTB leads with 0.58% vs -0.33% for FIXD. On fees, IMTB is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, IMTB has been the lower-risk option at 1.46%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, IMTB has performed better with a 0.58% return vs -0.33%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IMTB is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for FIXD.
FIXD has the higher dividend yield at 4.69%, compared with 4.52% for IMTB.
They also come from different issuers: First Trust and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for FIXD and 0.06% for IMTB.
IMTB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.41 vs 1.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FIXD and IMTB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer