FIX vs. MU
FIX (Comfort Systems USA, Inc.) and MU (Micron Technology, Inc.) are both stocks. FIX operates in Engineering & Construction (Industrials), while MU operates in Semiconductors (Technology). Over the past 10 years, FIX returned 51.38%/yr vs 51.33%/yr for MU. Their 0.29 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
FIX vs. MU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FIX achieves a 85.50% return, which is significantly lower than MU's 188.53% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FIX having a 51.38% annualized return and MU not far behind at 51.33%.
FIX
- 1D
- 1.88%
- 1M
- -7.26%
- 6M
- 51.59%
- YTD
- 85.50%
- 1Y
- 146.49%
- 3Y*
- 115.90%
- 5Y*
- 88.25%
- 10Y*
- 51.38%
- ALL TIME*
- 18.36%
MU
- 1D
- -5.90%
- 1M
- -20.26%
- 6M
- 98.49%
- YTD
- 188.53%
- 1Y
- 655.32%
- 3Y*
- 127.41%
- 5Y*
- 61.18%
- 10Y*
- 51.33%
- ALL TIME*
- 17.06%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $996.20M | $926.93M | $912.73M | |
| $43.28B | $42.78B | $49.13B |
FIX vs. MU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FIX Comfort Systems USA, Inc. | 85.50% | 120.86% | 106.89% | 79.62% | 16.98% | 88.98% | 6.73% | 15.07% | 0.73% | 32.13% |
MU Micron Technology, Inc. | 188.53% | 240.24% | -0.96% | 71.93% | -45.93% | 24.21% | 39.79% | 69.49% | -22.84% | 87.59% |
Correlation
The correlation between FIX and MU is 0.57, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.57 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.52 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.48 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.41 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 1997 | 0.29 |
Over the past year, FIX and MU have become more correlated (0.57) than their long-term average of 0.29, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Fundamentals
FIX:
$60.88B
MU:
$929.52B
FIX:
$40.64
MU:
$44.42
FIX:
42.56
MU:
18.53
FIX:
0.64
MU:
0.07
FIX:
5.44
MU:
10.36
FIX:
18.95
MU:
9.33
FIX:
$11.23B
MU:
$90.27B
FIX:
$2.88B
MU:
$65.51B
FIX:
$1.96B
MU:
$44.96B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FIX vs. MU — Risk / Return Rank
FIX
MU
FIX vs. MU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Comfort Systems USA, Inc. (FIX) and Micron Technology, Inc. (MU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FIX | MU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -5.50 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.99 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.63 | -0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.57 | 16.92 | -11.35 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 21.44 | 64.08 | -42.64 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FIX vs. MU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FIX drawdown since its inception was -93.36%, roughly equal to the maximum MU drawdown of -98.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIX and MU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FIX | MU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -93.36% | -98.25% | +4.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.45% | -39.10% | +12.65% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -46.05% | -57.63% | +11.58% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -46.05% | -57.63% | +11.58% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -49.68% | -57.63% | +7.95% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.30% | -32.17% | +15.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -37.94% | -58.02% | +20.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.86% | 10.31% | -3.45% |
Volatility
FIX vs. MU - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Comfort Systems USA, Inc. (FIX) is 20.83%, while Micron Technology, Inc. (MU) has a volatility of 31.11%. This indicates that FIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FIX | MU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 20.83% | 31.11% | -10.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 42.97% | 67.64% | -24.67% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 55.22% | 81.13% | -25.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 45.94% | 56.32% | -10.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 43.10% | 51.42% | -8.32% |
Dividends
FIX vs. MU - Dividend Comparison
FIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.15%, more than MU's 0.06% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FIX Comfort Systems USA, Inc. | 0.15% | 0.21% | 0.28% | 0.41% | 0.49% | 0.49% | 0.81% | 0.79% | 0.76% | 0.68% | 0.83% | 0.88% |
MU Micron Technology, Inc. | 0.06% | 0.16% | 0.55% | 0.54% | 0.89% | 0.21% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
FIX vs. MU - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Comfort Systems USA, Inc. and Micron Technology, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
FIX vs. MU - Profitability Comparison
FIX - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Comfort Systems USA, Inc. reported a gross profit of 844.23M and revenue of 3.27B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 25.9%.
MU - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Micron Technology, Inc. reported a gross profit of 35.06B and revenue of 41.46B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 84.6%.
FIX - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Comfort Systems USA, Inc. reported an operating income of 557.97M and revenue of 3.27B, resulting in an operating margin of 17.1%.
MU - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Micron Technology, Inc. reported an operating income of 33.31B and revenue of 41.46B, resulting in an operating margin of 80.4%.
FIX - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Comfort Systems USA, Inc. reported a net income of 441.60M and revenue of 3.27B, resulting in a net margin of 13.5%.
MU - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Micron Technology, Inc. reported a net income of 28.24B and revenue of 41.46B, resulting in a net margin of 68.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
FIX and MU have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MU has higher volatility (31.11%) compared to FIX (20.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIX dropped -93.36% vs MU's -98.25%.
MU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (8.17 vs 2.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FIX and MU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer