PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FIWGX vs. PGSIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FIWGX vs. PGSIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Strategic Advisers Fidelity Core Income Fund (FIWGX) and Putnam Mortgage Securities Fund (PGSIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FIWGX achieves a -0.05% return, which is significantly lower than PGSIX's 2.64% return.


FIWGX

1D
-0.22%
1M
0.12%
YTD
-0.05%
6M
0.06%
1Y
4.16%
3Y*
4.28%
5Y*
0.30%
10Y*

PGSIX

1D
-0.25%
1M
1.03%
YTD
2.64%
6M
3.04%
1Y
8.46%
3Y*
6.56%
5Y*
0.39%
10Y*
1.48%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FIWGX vs. PGSIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FIWGX
Strategic Advisers Fidelity Core Income Fund
-0.05%6.90%2.14%6.51%-13.71%-0.37%10.21%9.39%1.28%
PGSIX
Putnam Mortgage Securities Fund
2.64%9.36%3.52%3.66%-10.79%-4.31%-0.73%12.39%0.81%

Correlation

The correlation between FIWGX and PGSIX is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.78

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 25, 2018

0.64

The correlation between FIWGX and PGSIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.63 (1 year) to 0.78 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FIWGX vs. PGSIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FIWGX
FIWGX Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
FIWGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIWGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIWGX Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
FIWGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIWGX Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

PGSIX
PGSIX Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
PGSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PGSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
PGSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
PGSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
PGSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FIWGX vs. PGSIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Strategic Advisers Fidelity Core Income Fund (FIWGX) and Putnam Mortgage Securities Fund (PGSIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FIWGXPGSIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.48

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.75

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.34

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.23

3.28

-1.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.60

10.94

-4.35

FIWGX vs. PGSIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FIWGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.36, which is comparable to the PGSIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FIWGX and PGSIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FIWGXPGSIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.36

1.84

-0.48

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.05

0.06

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.25

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.49

0.84

-0.35

Drawdowns

FIWGX vs. PGSIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FIWGX drawdown since its inception was -18.42%, smaller than the maximum PGSIX drawdown of -22.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIWGX and PGSIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FIWGXPGSIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.42%

-22.28%

+3.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.52%

-2.85%

+0.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.24%

-6.88%

+0.64%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.42%

-20.83%

+2.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.22%

-0.25%

-0.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.03%

-2.61%

-2.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.12%

0.85%

+0.27%

Volatility

FIWGX vs. PGSIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Strategic Advisers Fidelity Core Income Fund (FIWGX) is 1.50%, while Putnam Mortgage Securities Fund (PGSIX) has a volatility of 1.72%. This indicates that FIWGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PGSIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FIWGXPGSIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.50%

1.72%

-0.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.83%

3.41%

-0.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.14%

5.07%

-0.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.10%

7.00%

-0.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.51%

5.95%

-0.44%

FIWGX vs. PGSIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FIWGX has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is lower than PGSIX's 0.89% expense ratio.


Dividends

FIWGX vs. PGSIX - Dividend Comparison

FIWGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.44%, less than PGSIX's 4.64% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FIWGX
Strategic Advisers Fidelity Core Income Fund
3.44%3.68%4.36%3.79%2.24%1.77%6.83%4.30%0.57%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PGSIX
Putnam Mortgage Securities Fund
4.64%5.67%16.88%8.38%12.83%4.30%4.21%4.50%3.94%3.10%2.92%2.51%

Frequently Asked Questions


FIWGX and PGSIX have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PGSIX has higher volatility (1.72%) compared to FIWGX (1.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIWGX dropped -18.42% vs PGSIX's -22.28%.

PGSIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.84 vs 1.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FIWGX and PGSIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer