PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FIWFX vs. FIRMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FIWFX vs. FIRMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Freedom Index 2015 Fund Institutional Premium Class (FIWFX) and Fidelity Managed Retirement Income Fund (FIRMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FIWFX achieves a 5.34% return, which is significantly higher than FIRMX's 4.04% return. Over the past 10 years, FIWFX has outperformed FIRMX with an annualized return of 6.44%, while FIRMX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.21% annualized return.


FIWFX

1D
0.19%
1M
2.29%
YTD
5.34%
6M
5.56%
1Y
13.55%
3Y*
9.93%
5Y*
4.35%
10Y*
6.44%

FIRMX

1D
0.20%
1M
1.54%
YTD
4.04%
6M
4.26%
1Y
10.41%
3Y*
7.59%
5Y*
2.91%
10Y*
4.21%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FIWFX vs. FIRMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FIWFX
Fidelity Freedom Index 2015 Fund Institutional Premium Class
5.34%11.81%6.76%11.32%-14.44%6.84%11.61%16.47%-3.39%12.67%
FIRMX
Fidelity Managed Retirement Income Fund
4.04%9.95%4.29%8.07%-11.66%2.77%8.57%10.57%-1.80%7.08%

Correlation

The correlation between FIWFX and FIRMX is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2015

0.92

The correlation between FIWFX and FIRMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FIWFX vs. FIRMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FIWFX
FIWFX Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
FIWFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIWFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIWFX Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
FIWFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIWFX Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

FIRMX
FIRMX Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
FIRMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIRMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIRMX Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
FIRMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIRMX Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FIWFX vs. FIRMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Freedom Index 2015 Fund Institutional Premium Class (FIWFX) and Fidelity Managed Retirement Income Fund (FIRMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FIWFXFIRMXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.51

1.50

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.15

3.04

+0.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.96

12.98

+0.98

FIWFX vs. FIRMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FIWFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.58, which is comparable to the FIRMX Sharpe Ratio of 2.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FIWFX and FIRMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FIWFXFIRMXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.58

2.52

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

0.55

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

0.94

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.79

0.55

+0.24

Drawdowns

FIWFX vs. FIRMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FIWFX drawdown since its inception was -19.50%, smaller than the maximum FIRMX drawdown of -33.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIWFX and FIRMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FIWFXFIRMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.50%

-33.73%

+14.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.31%

-3.44%

-0.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.72%

-4.96%

-1.76%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.50%

-16.11%

-3.39%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.50%

-16.11%

-3.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.29%

-3.71%

+0.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.97%

0.81%

+0.16%

Volatility

FIWFX vs. FIRMX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Freedom Index 2015 Fund Institutional Premium Class (FIWFX) has a higher volatility of 1.86% compared to Fidelity Managed Retirement Income Fund (FIRMX) at 1.65%. This indicates that FIWFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FIRMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FIWFXFIRMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.86%

1.65%

+0.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.34%

3.42%

+0.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.27%

4.16%

+1.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.29%

5.28%

+2.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.50%

4.51%

+2.99%

FIWFX vs. FIRMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FIWFX has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than FIRMX's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

FIWFX vs. FIRMX - Dividend Comparison

FIWFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.87%, more than FIRMX's 3.09% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FIRMX
Fidelity Managed Retirement Income Fund
3.09%3.13%3.02%2.81%4.54%3.56%2.48%2.59%4.65%8.57%1.67%1.68%
FIWFX
Fidelity Freedom Index 2015 Fund Institutional Premium Class
4.87%5.46%5.21%2.60%3.14%2.90%2.67%18.25%3.19%1.99%1.91%1.77%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, FIWFX and FIRMX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FIWFX has higher volatility (1.86%) compared to FIRMX (1.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIWFX dropped -19.50% vs FIRMX's -33.73%.

FIWFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.58 vs 2.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FIWFX and FIRMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer