PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FIWFX vs. FIRMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FIWFX vs. FIRMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Freedom Index 2015 Fund Institutional Premium Class (FIWFX) and Fidelity Managed Retirement Income Fund (FIRMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


FIWFX

1D
0.45%
1M
-0.06%
6M
3.31%
YTD
4.61%
1Y
9.33%
3Y*
9.30%
5Y*
3.75%
10Y*
6.11%
ALL TIME*
5.83%

FIRMX

1D
1M
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00

FIWFX vs. FIRMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FIWFX
Fidelity Freedom Index 2015 Fund Institutional Premium Class
4.61%11.81%6.76%11.32%-14.44%6.84%11.61%16.47%-3.39%12.67%
FIRMX
Fidelity Managed Retirement Income Fund
3.60%9.95%4.29%8.07%-11.66%2.77%8.57%10.57%-1.80%7.08%

Correlation

The correlation between FIWFX and FIRMX is 0.88, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.88

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.93

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 29, 2015

0.91

The correlation between FIWFX and FIRMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FIWFX vs. FIRMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FIWFX
FIWFX Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
FIWFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIWFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIWFX Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
FIWFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIWFX Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

FIRMX

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FIWFX vs. FIRMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Freedom Index 2015 Fund Institutional Premium Class (FIWFX) and Fidelity Managed Retirement Income Fund (FIRMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FIWFXFIRMXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.31

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.51

FIWFX vs. FIRMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FIWFX vs. FIRMX - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FIWFXFIRMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.50%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.05%

Volatility

FIWFX vs. FIRMX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FIWFXFIRMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.48%

FIWFX vs. FIRMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FIWFX has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than FIRMX's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

FIWFX vs. FIRMX - Dividend Comparison

FIWFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.90%, more than FIRMX's 2.81% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FIRMX
Fidelity Managed Retirement Income Fund
2.81%3.13%3.02%2.81%4.54%3.56%2.48%2.59%4.65%8.57%1.67%1.68%
FIWFX
Fidelity Freedom Index 2015 Fund Institutional Premium Class
4.90%5.46%5.21%2.60%3.14%2.90%2.67%18.25%3.19%1.99%1.91%1.77%

Frequently Asked Questions


FIWFX and FIRMX have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FIWFX and FIRMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer