FIWFX vs. FFSZX

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

FIWFX (Fidelity Freedom Index 2015 Fund Institutional Premium Class) and FFSZX (Fidelity Freedom 2065 Fund Class K6) are both Target Retirement Date funds from Fidelity. Over the past 5 years, FIWFX returned 3.98%/yr vs 10.16%/yr for FFSZX. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FIWFX charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for FFSZX.

Performance

FIWFX vs. FFSZX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Freedom Index 2015 Fund Institutional Premium Class (FIWFX) and Fidelity Freedom 2065 Fund Class K6 (FFSZX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FIWFX achieves a 4.41% return, which is significantly lower than FFSZX's 12.32% return.

FIWFX

• 1D: 0.19%
• 1M: -0.19%
• YTD: 4.41%
• 6M: 4.10%
• 1Y: 10.96%
• 3Y*: 9.42%
• 5Y*: 3.98%
• 10Y*: 6.53%

FFSZX

• 1D: 0.12%
• 1M: -0.35%
• YTD: 12.32%
• 6M: 11.61%
• 1Y: 27.15%
• 3Y*: 20.26%
• 5Y*: 10.16%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FIWFX vs. FFSZX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
FIWFX Fidelity Freedom Index 2015 Fund Institutional Premium Class	4.41%	11.81%	6.76%	11.32%	-14.44%	6.84%	11.61%	5.40%
FFSZX Fidelity Freedom 2065 Fund Class K6	12.32%	24.08%	14.41%	20.78%	-18.05%	16.81%	18.36%	9.18%

Correlation

The correlation between FIWFX and FFSZX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.91
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.88
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.88
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 28, 2019	0.89

The correlation between FIWFX and FFSZX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FIWFX vs. FFSZX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FIWFX

FIWFX Risk / Return Rank: 66
FIWFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
FIWFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
FIWFX Omega Ratio Rank: 70
FIWFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
FIWFX Martin Ratio Rank: 68

FFSZX

FFSZX Risk / Return Rank: 68
FFSZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
FFSZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
FFSZX Omega Ratio Rank: 66
FFSZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
FFSZX Martin Ratio Rank: 78

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FIWFX vs. FFSZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Freedom Index 2015 Fund Institutional Premium Class (FIWFX) and Fidelity Freedom 2065 Fund Class K6 (FFSZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FIWFX	FFSZX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.95	1.96	-0.01
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.80	2.69	+0.12
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	1.37	+0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.55	2.78	-0.23
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.99	12.14	-1.16

FIWFX vs. FFSZX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FIWFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.95, which is comparable to the FFSZX Sharpe Ratio of 1.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FIWFX and FFSZX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FIWFX vs. FFSZX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FIWFX drawdown since its inception was -19.50%, smaller than the maximum FFSZX drawdown of -31.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIWFX and FFSZX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FIWFX	FFSZX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.50%	-31.00%	+11.50%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.31%	-9.77%	+5.46%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-6.72%	-15.36%	+8.64%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.50%	-27.17%	+7.67%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-19.50%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.88%	-2.39%	+1.51%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.28%	-5.77%	+2.49%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.00%	2.23%	-1.23%

Volatility

FIWFX vs. FFSZX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Freedom Index 2015 Fund Institutional Premium Class (FIWFX) is 2.43%, while Fidelity Freedom 2065 Fund Class K6 (FFSZX) has a volatility of 6.20%. This indicates that FIWFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FFSZX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FIWFX	FFSZX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.43%	6.20%	-3.77%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.78%	11.91%	-7.13%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.67%	13.91%	-8.24%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	7.35%	15.22%	-7.87%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	7.49%	17.12%	-9.63%

FIWFX vs. FFSZX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FIWFX has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than FFSZX's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

FIWFX vs. FFSZX - Dividend Comparison

FIWFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.91%, less than FFSZX's 5.10% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FFSZX Fidelity Freedom 2065 Fund Class K6	5.10%	3.82%	2.92%	2.26%	8.99%	7.98%	2.41%	1.47%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
FIWFX Fidelity Freedom Index 2015 Fund Institutional Premium Class	4.91%	5.46%	5.21%	2.60%	3.14%	2.90%	2.67%	18.25%	3.19%	1.99%	1.91%	1.77%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FIWFX and FFSZX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.91, FIWFX and FFSZX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, FIWFX or FFSZX?

FFSZX has higher volatility (6.20%) compared to FIWFX (2.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIWFX dropped -19.50% vs FFSZX's -31.00%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FFSZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.96 vs 1.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.