FIWBX vs. DGTSX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

FIWBX (Fidelity Advisor Multi-Asset Income Fund Class Z) and DGTSX (DFA Global Allocation 25/75 Portfolio) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Over the past 5 years, FIWBX returned 6.32%/yr vs 5.27%/yr for DGTSX. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FIWBX charges 0.71%/yr vs 0.24%/yr for DGTSX.

Performance

FIWBX vs. DGTSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Multi-Asset Income Fund Class Z (FIWBX) and DFA Global Allocation 25/75 Portfolio (DGTSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FIWBX achieves a 6.91% return, which is significantly higher than DGTSX's 4.23% return.

FIWBX

• 1D: -0.31%
• 1M: -0.90%
• YTD: 6.91%
• 6M: 6.43%
• 1Y: 18.05%
• 3Y*: 12.37%
• 5Y*: 6.32%
• 10Y*: —

DGTSX

• 1D: -0.07%
• 1M: 0.69%
• YTD: 4.23%
• 6M: 4.08%
• 1Y: 9.62%
• 3Y*: 8.40%
• 5Y*: 5.27%
• 10Y*: 5.28%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FIWBX vs. DGTSX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
FIWBX Fidelity Advisor Multi-Asset Income Fund Class Z	6.91%	14.25%	9.95%	11.84%	-13.62%	17.34%	16.66%	23.26%	-2.96%
DGTSX DFA Global Allocation 25/75 Portfolio	4.23%	8.39%	7.43%	8.93%	-8.06%	10.20%	7.29%	9.80%	-2.00%

Correlation

The correlation between FIWBX and DGTSX is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.81
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.83
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.85
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2018	0.86

The correlation between FIWBX and DGTSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FIWBX vs. DGTSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FIWBX

FIWBX Risk / Return Rank: 46
FIWBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 42
FIWBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 38
FIWBX Omega Ratio Rank: 40
FIWBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
FIWBX Martin Ratio Rank: 48

DGTSX

DGTSX Risk / Return Rank: 88
DGTSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
DGTSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
DGTSX Omega Ratio Rank: 87
DGTSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
DGTSX Martin Ratio Rank: 90

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FIWBX vs. DGTSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Multi-Asset Income Fund Class Z (FIWBX) and DFA Global Allocation 25/75 Portfolio (DGTSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FIWBX	DGTSX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.75	2.77	-1.01
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.40	4.13	-1.73
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	1.57	-0.26
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.85	3.76	-0.91
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.42	16.52	-7.09

FIWBX vs. DGTSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FIWBX Sharpe Ratio is 1.75, which is lower than the DGTSX Sharpe Ratio of 2.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FIWBX and DGTSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FIWBX vs. DGTSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FIWBX drawdown since its inception was -21.63%, which is greater than DGTSX's maximum drawdown of -16.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIWBX and DGTSX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FIWBX	DGTSX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-21.63%	-16.71%	-4.92%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.47%	-2.64%	-3.83%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.15%	-7.46%	-5.69%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-18.08%	-11.26%	-6.82%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-11.26%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.14%	-0.20%	-1.94%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.00%	-1.64%	-2.36%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.95%	0.60%	+1.35%

Volatility

FIWBX vs. DGTSX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Multi-Asset Income Fund Class Z (FIWBX) has a higher volatility of 3.99% compared to DFA Global Allocation 25/75 Portfolio (DGTSX) at 1.38%. This indicates that FIWBX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DGTSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FIWBX	DGTSX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.99%	1.38%	+2.61%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.11%	2.97%	+5.14%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.55%	3.60%	+6.95%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	9.93%	5.98%	+3.95%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.98%	5.24%	+5.74%

FIWBX vs. DGTSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FIWBX has a 0.71% expense ratio, which is higher than DGTSX's 0.24% expense ratio.

Dividends

FIWBX vs. DGTSX - Dividend Comparison

FIWBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.57%, less than DGTSX's 5.70% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DGTSX DFA Global Allocation 25/75 Portfolio	5.70%	5.54%	7.28%	4.75%	2.77%	7.62%	2.12%	2.57%	2.99%	1.25%	1.26%	1.50%
FIWBX Fidelity Advisor Multi-Asset Income Fund Class Z	3.57%	3.86%	3.91%	4.31%	3.80%	2.87%	3.48%	2.91%	1.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FIWBX and DGTSX in my portfolio?

FIWBX and DGTSX have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FIWBX or DGTSX?

FIWBX has higher volatility (3.99%) compared to DGTSX (1.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIWBX dropped -21.63% vs DGTSX's -16.71%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DGTSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.77 vs 1.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.