PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FIWBX vs. FZROX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FIWBX vs. FZROX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Multi-Asset Income Fund Class Z (FIWBX) and Fidelity ZERO Total Market Index Fund (FZROX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FIWBX achieves a 6.91% return, which is significantly lower than FZROX's 10.41% return.


FIWBX

1D
-0.31%
1M
-0.90%
YTD
6.91%
6M
6.43%
1Y
18.05%
3Y*
12.37%
5Y*
6.32%
10Y*

FZROX

1D
-0.31%
1M
0.62%
YTD
10.41%
6M
9.30%
1Y
26.02%
3Y*
21.31%
5Y*
12.61%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FIWBX vs. FZROX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FIWBX
Fidelity Advisor Multi-Asset Income Fund Class Z
6.91%14.25%9.95%11.84%-13.62%17.34%16.66%23.26%-2.96%
FZROX
Fidelity ZERO Total Market Index Fund
10.41%17.23%23.94%26.20%-19.21%26.00%20.51%31.15%-11.49%

Correlation

The correlation between FIWBX and FZROX is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.80

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2018

0.86

The correlation between FIWBX and FZROX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FIWBX vs. FZROX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FIWBX
FIWBX Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
FIWBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIWBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIWBX Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
FIWBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIWBX Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

FZROX
FZROX Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
FZROX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FZROX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
FZROX Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
FZROX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
FZROX Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FIWBX vs. FZROX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Multi-Asset Income Fund Class Z (FIWBX) and Fidelity ZERO Total Market Index Fund (FZROX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FIWBXFZROXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.37

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.48

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.38

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.85

3.08

-0.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.42

13.77

-4.35

FIWBX vs. FZROX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FIWBX Sharpe Ratio is 1.75, which is comparable to the FZROX Sharpe Ratio of 2.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FIWBX and FZROX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FIWBX vs. FZROX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FIWBX drawdown since its inception was -21.63%, smaller than the maximum FZROX drawdown of -34.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIWBX and FZROX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FIWBXFZROXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.63%

-34.96%

+13.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.47%

-8.89%

+2.42%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.15%

-19.38%

+6.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.08%

-25.12%

+7.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.14%

-1.44%

-0.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.00%

-5.48%

+1.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.95%

1.98%

-0.03%

Volatility

FIWBX vs. FZROX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Multi-Asset Income Fund Class Z (FIWBX) is 3.99%, while Fidelity ZERO Total Market Index Fund (FZROX) has a volatility of 4.82%. This indicates that FIWBX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FZROX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FIWBXFZROXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.99%

4.82%

-0.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.11%

10.10%

-1.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.55%

12.88%

-2.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.93%

17.53%

-7.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.98%

20.13%

-9.15%

FIWBX vs. FZROX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FIWBX has a 0.71% expense ratio, which is higher than FZROX's 0.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

FIWBX vs. FZROX - Dividend Comparison

FIWBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.57%, more than FZROX's 0.93% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
FIWBX
Fidelity Advisor Multi-Asset Income Fund Class Z
3.57%3.86%3.91%4.31%3.80%2.87%3.48%2.91%1.00%
FZROX
Fidelity ZERO Total Market Index Fund
0.93%1.02%1.16%1.36%1.57%1.25%1.27%1.51%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FIWBX and FZROX have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FZROX has higher volatility (4.82%) compared to FIWBX (3.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIWBX dropped -21.63% vs FZROX's -34.96%.

FZROX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.13 vs 1.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FIWBX and FZROX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer