PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FIW vs. AIRR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FIW vs. AIRR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Water ETF (FIW) and First Trust RBA American Industrial Renaissance ETF (AIRR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FIW achieves a -3.78% return, which is significantly lower than AIRR's 31.77% return. Over the past 10 years, FIW has underperformed AIRR with an annualized return of 12.18%, while AIRR has yielded a comparatively higher 21.89% annualized return.


FIW

1D
0.28%
1M
-0.84%
YTD
-3.78%
6M
-6.34%
1Y
-2.02%
3Y*
7.84%
5Y*
5.36%
10Y*
12.18%

AIRR

1D
0.54%
1M
3.36%
YTD
31.77%
6M
31.32%
1Y
65.82%
3Y*
37.10%
5Y*
25.40%
10Y*
21.89%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FIW vs. AIRR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FIW
First Trust Water ETF
-3.78%7.20%8.38%20.35%-15.70%32.00%21.15%37.37%-9.23%24.69%
AIRR
First Trust RBA American Industrial Renaissance ETF
31.77%27.92%33.45%31.43%-2.08%33.01%17.17%33.97%-20.57%16.28%

Correlation

The correlation between FIW and AIRR is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.79

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 12, 2014

0.82

The correlation between FIW and AIRR shifts across timeframes, from 0.71 (1 year) to 0.82 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FIW vs. AIRR - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FIW
AIRR

Industrials

54.1%
84.6%

Utilities

16.2%

-

Healthcare

8.1%

-

Technology

8.1%
0.5%

Basic Materials

5.4%

-

Consumer Cyclical

2.7%

-

Consumer Defensive

2.7%

-

Communication Services

-

-

Energy

-

3.8%

Financial Services

-

9.6%

Real Estate

-

-

Industrials

FIW
54.1%
AIRR
84.6%

Utilities

FIW
16.2%
AIRR

-

Healthcare

FIW
8.1%
AIRR

-

Technology

FIW
8.1%
AIRR
0.5%

Basic Materials

FIW
5.4%
AIRR

-

Consumer Cyclical

FIW
2.7%
AIRR

-

Consumer Defensive

FIW
2.7%
AIRR

-

Communication Services

FIW

-

AIRR

-

Energy

FIW

-

AIRR
3.8%

Financial Services

FIW

-

AIRR
9.6%

Real Estate

FIW

-

AIRR

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FIW vs. AIRR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FIW
FIW Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
FIW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIW Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIW Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
FIW Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIW Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank

AIRR
AIRR Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
AIRR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AIRR Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
AIRR Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
AIRR Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
AIRR Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FIW vs. AIRR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Water ETF (FIW) and First Trust RBA American Industrial Renaissance ETF (AIRR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FIWAIRRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.75

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.45

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.99

1.41

-0.42

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.15

5.05

-5.20

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.38

18.68

-19.06

FIW vs. AIRR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FIW Sharpe Ratio is -0.13, which is lower than the AIRR Sharpe Ratio of 2.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FIW and AIRR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FIWAIRRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.13

2.61

-2.75

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

1.01

-0.72

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

0.84

-0.22

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.43

0.67

-0.24

Drawdowns

FIW vs. AIRR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FIW drawdown since its inception was -52.75%, which is greater than AIRR's maximum drawdown of -42.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIW and AIRR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FIWAIRRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.75%

-42.37%

-10.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.81%

-13.09%

-0.72%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.32%

-27.95%

+9.63%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.53%

-27.95%

-0.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.60%

-42.37%

+5.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.76%

-1.86%

-7.90%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.30%

-7.43%

-0.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.33%

3.53%

+1.80%

Volatility

FIW vs. AIRR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Water ETF (FIW) is 4.45%, while First Trust RBA American Industrial Renaissance ETF (AIRR) has a volatility of 7.87%. This indicates that FIW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AIRR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FIWAIRRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.45%

7.87%

-3.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.42%

19.82%

-8.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.50%

25.40%

-9.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.35%

25.29%

-6.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.90%

26.29%

-6.39%

FIW vs. AIRR - Expense Ratio Comparison

FIW has a 0.54% expense ratio, which is lower than AIRR's 0.70% expense ratio.


Dividends

FIW vs. AIRR - Dividend Comparison

FIW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.79%, more than AIRR's 0.13% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AIRR
First Trust RBA American Industrial Renaissance ETF
0.13%0.19%0.18%0.23%0.12%0.05%0.10%0.20%0.43%0.30%0.08%0.47%
FIW
First Trust Water ETF
0.79%0.69%0.69%0.68%0.67%0.37%0.56%0.55%0.73%1.13%0.51%0.76%

Frequently Asked Questions


FIW and AIRR have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AIRR has higher volatility (7.87%) compared to FIW (4.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIW dropped -52.75% vs AIRR's -42.37%.

On 10-year performance, AIRR leads with 21.89% vs 12.18% for FIW. On fees, FIW is cheaper at 0.54% per year. On volatility, FIW has been the lower-risk option at 4.45%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, AIRR has performed better with a 21.89% return vs 12.18%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FIW is cheaper with a 0.54% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for AIRR.

FIW has the higher dividend yield at 0.79%, compared with 0.13% for AIRR.

FIW is categorized as Water Equities, while AIRR is Building & Construction. FIW tracks ISE Clean Edge Water Index, while AIRR tracks Richard Bernstein Advisors American Industrial Renaissance (TR). Their fees differ too: 0.54% for FIW and 0.70% for AIRR.

AIRR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.61 vs -0.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FIW and AIRR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer