PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FIVQX vs. GSIMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FIVQX vs. GSIMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor International Value Fund Class I (FIVQX) and Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund (GSIMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FIVQX achieves a 7.01% return, which is significantly higher than GSIMX's 6.45% return.


FIVQX

1D
0.33%
1M
2.79%
YTD
7.01%
6M
11.09%
1Y
23.49%
3Y*
21.44%
5Y*
12.15%
10Y*
9.31%

GSIMX

1D
0.04%
1M
-0.54%
YTD
6.45%
6M
8.00%
1Y
12.69%
3Y*
17.16%
5Y*
9.05%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FIVQX vs. GSIMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FIVQX
Fidelity Advisor International Value Fund Class I
7.01%43.57%4.85%19.10%-7.95%14.94%3.26%18.95%-17.20%16.91%
GSIMX
Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund
6.45%20.85%9.66%22.10%-11.06%12.50%15.77%27.64%-6.04%29.92%

Correlation

The correlation between FIVQX and GSIMX is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.77

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2017

0.80

The correlation between FIVQX and GSIMX shifts across timeframes, from 0.70 (1 year) to 0.83 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FIVQX vs. GSIMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FIVQX
FIVQX Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
FIVQX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIVQX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIVQX Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
FIVQX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIVQX Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

GSIMX
GSIMX Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
GSIMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSIMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSIMX Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
GSIMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSIMX Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FIVQX vs. GSIMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor International Value Fund Class I (FIVQX) and Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund (GSIMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FIVQXGSIMXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.27

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.23

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.18

1.56

+0.62

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.05

5.22

+2.83

FIVQX vs. GSIMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FIVQX Sharpe Ratio is 1.54, which is comparable to the GSIMX Sharpe Ratio of 1.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FIVQX and GSIMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FIVQXGSIMXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.54

1.27

+0.27

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

0.63

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.24

0.82

-0.58

Drawdowns

FIVQX vs. GSIMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FIVQX drawdown since its inception was -64.41%, which is greater than GSIMX's maximum drawdown of -28.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIVQX and GSIMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FIVQXGSIMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.41%

-28.84%

-35.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.37%

-7.81%

-2.56%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.47%

-10.32%

-4.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.53%

-25.37%

-2.16%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.37%

-3.70%

+2.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.25%

-4.82%

-11.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.81%

2.33%

+0.48%

Volatility

FIVQX vs. GSIMX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor International Value Fund Class I (FIVQX) has a higher volatility of 4.80% compared to Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund (GSIMX) at 2.77%. This indicates that FIVQX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GSIMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FIVQXGSIMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.80%

2.77%

+2.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.85%

7.89%

+3.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.73%

9.66%

+5.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.60%

14.36%

+2.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.94%

15.69%

+2.25%

FIVQX vs. GSIMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FIVQX has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is higher than GSIMX's 0.76% expense ratio.


Dividends

FIVQX vs. GSIMX - Dividend Comparison

FIVQX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.23%, less than GSIMX's 4.81% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FIVQX
Fidelity Advisor International Value Fund Class I
2.23%2.38%2.34%2.05%1.87%4.29%1.76%3.46%3.26%0.15%2.61%1.19%
GSIMX
Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund
4.81%5.12%11.18%2.36%4.89%2.23%0.18%0.65%0.53%0.16%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FIVQX and GSIMX have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FIVQX has higher volatility (4.80%) compared to GSIMX (2.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIVQX dropped -64.41% vs GSIMX's -28.84%.

FIVQX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.54 vs 1.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FIVQX and GSIMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer