PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FIVQX vs. ^GSPC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FIVQX vs. ^GSPC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor International Value Fund Class I (FIVQX) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FIVQX achieves a 6.65% return, which is significantly lower than ^GSPC's 11.16% return. Over the past 10 years, FIVQX has underperformed ^GSPC with an annualized return of 9.27%, while ^GSPC has yielded a comparatively higher 13.75% annualized return.


FIVQX

1D
-0.40%
1M
1.14%
YTD
6.65%
6M
11.04%
1Y
22.11%
3Y*
21.31%
5Y*
11.96%
10Y*
9.27%

^GSPC

1D
0.13%
1M
5.25%
YTD
11.16%
6M
11.43%
1Y
28.20%
3Y*
21.12%
5Y*
12.66%
10Y*
13.75%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FIVQX vs. ^GSPC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FIVQX
Fidelity Advisor International Value Fund Class I
6.65%43.57%4.85%19.10%-7.95%14.94%3.26%18.95%-17.20%17.82%
^GSPC
S&P 500 Index
11.16%16.39%23.31%24.23%-19.44%26.89%16.26%28.88%-6.24%19.42%

Correlation

The correlation between FIVQX and ^GSPC is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.65

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 22, 2006

0.77

The correlation between FIVQX and ^GSPC shifts across timeframes, from 0.65 (3 years) to 0.77 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FIVQX vs. ^GSPC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FIVQX
FIVQX Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
FIVQX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIVQX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIVQX Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
FIVQX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIVQX Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

^GSPC
^GSPC Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
^GSPC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^GSPC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
^GSPC Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
^GSPC Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
^GSPC Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FIVQX vs. ^GSPC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor International Value Fund Class I (FIVQX) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FIVQX^GSPCDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.59

2.39

-0.79

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.27

3.25

-0.98

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.43

-0.15

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.28

3.16

-0.87

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.44

14.61

-6.17

FIVQX vs. ^GSPC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FIVQX Sharpe Ratio is 1.59, which is lower than the ^GSPC Sharpe Ratio of 2.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FIVQX and ^GSPC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FIVQX^GSPCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.59

2.39

-0.79

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

0.75

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

0.76

-0.24

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.24

0.47

-0.23

Drawdowns

FIVQX vs. ^GSPC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FIVQX drawdown since its inception was -64.41%, which is greater than ^GSPC's maximum drawdown of -56.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIVQX and ^GSPC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FIVQX^GSPCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.41%

-56.78%

-7.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.37%

-9.10%

-1.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.47%

-18.90%

+4.43%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.53%

-25.43%

-2.10%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.46%

-33.92%

-9.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.70%

0.00%

-1.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.26%

-10.72%

-5.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.80%

1.97%

+0.83%

Volatility

FIVQX vs. ^GSPC - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor International Value Fund Class I (FIVQX) has a higher volatility of 4.84% compared to S&P 500 Index (^GSPC) at 2.84%. This indicates that FIVQX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ^GSPC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FIVQX^GSPCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.84%

2.84%

+2.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.85%

8.98%

+2.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.75%

11.87%

+2.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.60%

16.90%

-0.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.94%

18.07%

-0.13%

Frequently Asked Questions


FIVQX and ^GSPC have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FIVQX has higher volatility (4.84%) compared to ^GSPC (2.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIVQX dropped -64.41% vs ^GSPC's -56.78%.

^GSPC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 1.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FIVQX and ^GSPC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer