FIVQX vs. GSLC

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

FIVQX (Fidelity Advisor International Value Fund Class I) and GSLC (Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF) are both funds - FIVQX is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund managed by Fidelity, while GSLC is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity Index. Over the past 10 years, FIVQX returned 9.27%/yr vs 14.72%/yr for GSLC. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FIVQX charges 1.05%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for GSLC.

Performance

FIVQX vs. GSLC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor International Value Fund Class I (FIVQX) and Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (GSLC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FIVQX achieves a 6.65% return, which is significantly lower than GSLC's 9.23% return. Over the past 10 years, FIVQX has underperformed GSLC with an annualized return of 9.27%, while GSLC has yielded a comparatively higher 14.72% annualized return.

FIVQX

• 1D: -0.40%
• 1M: 1.14%
• YTD: 6.65%
• 6M: 11.04%
• 1Y: 22.11%
• 3Y*: 21.31%
• 5Y*: 11.96%
• 10Y*: 9.27%

GSLC

• 1D: 0.14%
• 1M: 4.85%
• YTD: 9.23%
• 6M: 9.80%
• 1Y: 24.99%
• 3Y*: 21.12%
• 5Y*: 13.05%
• 10Y*: 14.72%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FIVQX vs. GSLC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FIVQX Fidelity Advisor International Value Fund Class I	6.65%	43.57%	4.85%	19.10%	-7.95%	14.94%	3.26%	18.95%	-17.20%	17.82%
GSLC Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF	9.23%	16.17%	24.21%	25.09%	-18.71%	27.17%	19.02%	30.74%	-4.07%	22.49%

Correlation

The correlation between FIVQX and GSLC is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.67
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.66
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.69
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.70
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2015	0.71

The correlation between FIVQX and GSLC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FIVQX vs. GSLC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FIVQX

FIVQX Risk / Return Rank: 33
FIVQX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 31
FIVQX Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
FIVQX Omega Ratio Rank: 30
FIVQX Calmar Ratio Rank: 36
FIVQX Martin Ratio Rank: 38

GSLC

GSLC Risk / Return Rank: 62
GSLC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
GSLC Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
GSLC Omega Ratio Rank: 63
GSLC Calmar Ratio Rank: 54
GSLC Martin Ratio Rank: 65

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FIVQX vs. GSLC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor International Value Fund Class I (FIVQX) and Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (GSLC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FIVQX	GSLC	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.59	2.15	-0.55
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.27	2.95	-0.67
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	1.39	-0.10
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.28	2.70	-0.42
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	8.44	12.04	-3.59
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FIVQX vs. GSLC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FIVQX Sharpe Ratio is 1.59, which is comparable to the GSLC Sharpe Ratio of 2.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FIVQX and GSLC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FIVQX	GSLC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.59	2.15	-0.55
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.72	0.79	-0.07
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.52	0.84	-0.32
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.24	0.82	-0.58

Drawdowns

FIVQX vs. GSLC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FIVQX drawdown since its inception was -64.41%, which is greater than GSLC's maximum drawdown of -33.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIVQX and GSLC.

Drawdown Indicators

	FIVQX	GSLC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-64.41%	-33.69%	-30.72%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.37%	-9.49%	-0.88%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.47%	-18.66%	+4.19%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-27.53%	-24.90%	-2.63%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-43.46%	-33.69%	-9.77%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.70%	0.00%	-1.70%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-16.26%	-4.39%	-11.87%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.80%	2.13%	+0.67%

Volatility

FIVQX vs. GSLC - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor International Value Fund Class I (FIVQX) has a higher volatility of 4.84% compared to Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (GSLC) at 2.65%. This indicates that FIVQX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GSLC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FIVQX	GSLC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.84%	2.65%	+2.19%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.85%	8.82%	+3.03%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.75%	11.70%	+3.05%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.60%	16.62%	-0.02%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.94%	17.68%	+0.26%

FIVQX vs. GSLC - Expense Ratio Comparison

FIVQX has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is higher than GSLC's 0.09% expense ratio.

Dividends

FIVQX vs. GSLC - Dividend Comparison

FIVQX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.24%, more than GSLC's 0.92% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FIVQX Fidelity Advisor International Value Fund Class I	2.24%	2.38%	2.34%	2.05%	1.87%	4.29%	1.76%	3.46%	3.26%	0.15%	2.61%	1.19%
GSLC Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF	0.92%	1.00%	1.11%	1.38%	1.61%	1.06%	1.35%	1.54%	1.89%	1.69%	1.69%	0.36%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FIVQX and GSLC in my portfolio?

FIVQX and GSLC have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FIVQX or GSLC?

FIVQX has higher volatility (4.84%) compared to GSLC (2.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIVQX dropped -64.41% vs GSLC's -33.69%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GSLC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.15 vs 1.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.