FIVLX vs. FASPX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity International Value Fund (FIVLX) and Fidelity Advisor Value Strategies Fund Class M (FASPX).
FIVLX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on May 18, 2006. FASPX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Aug 20, 1986.
Performance
FIVLX vs. FASPX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FIVLX vs. FASPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FIVLX Fidelity International Value Fund | 1.06% | 43.67% | 5.33% | 19.27% | -7.99% | 14.89% | 3.36% | 18.92% | -17.17% | 17.85% |
FASPX Fidelity Advisor Value Strategies Fund Class M | 6.23% | 7.76% | -2.60% | 19.93% | -7.82% | 32.65% | 7.70% | 33.85% | -17.27% | 17.34% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FIVLX achieves a 1.06% return, which is significantly lower than FASPX's 6.23% return. Over the past 10 years, FIVLX has underperformed FASPX with an annualized return of 9.18%, while FASPX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.64% annualized return.
FIVLX
- 1D
- 2.66%
- 1M
- -5.06%
- YTD
- 1.06%
- 6M
- 6.77%
- 1Y
- 27.34%
- 3Y*
- 19.99%
- 5Y*
- 12.26%
- 10Y*
- 9.18%
FASPX
- 1D
- 2.83%
- 1M
- -6.43%
- YTD
- 6.23%
- 6M
- 9.74%
- 1Y
- 23.62%
- 3Y*
- 9.76%
- 5Y*
- 6.73%
- 10Y*
- 9.64%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FIVLX vs. FASPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FIVLX has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is lower than FASPX's 1.37% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FIVLX vs. FASPX — Risk / Return Rank
FIVLX
FASPX
FIVLX vs. FASPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity International Value Fund (FIVLX) and Fidelity Advisor Value Strategies Fund Class M (FASPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FIVLX | FASPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.59 | 1.08 | +0.51 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.13 | 1.65 | +0.48 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.22 | +0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.27 | 1.61 | +0.66 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.01 | 6.47 | +2.54 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FIVLX | FASPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.59 | 1.08 | +0.51 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.75 | 0.33 | +0.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.52 | 0.44 | +0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.21 | 0.40 | -0.19 |
Correlation
The correlation between FIVLX and FASPX is 0.77, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FIVLX vs. FASPX - Dividend Comparison
FIVLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.30%, less than FASPX's 8.78% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FIVLX Fidelity International Value Fund | 2.30% | 2.32% | 2.90% | 2.06% | 1.85% | 4.35% | 1.74% | 3.54% | 3.33% | 0.15% | 2.71% | 1.44% |
FASPX Fidelity Advisor Value Strategies Fund Class M | 8.78% | 9.32% | 0.00% | 2.40% | 1.93% | 7.80% | 0.55% | 4.98% | 15.67% | 7.26% | 21.61% | 0.80% |
Drawdowns
FIVLX vs. FASPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FIVLX drawdown since its inception was -65.21%, smaller than the maximum FASPX drawdown of -70.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIVLX and FASPX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FIVLX | FASPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.21% | -70.11% | +4.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.58% | -15.26% | +3.68% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.49% | -34.53% | +7.04% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.43% | -48.02% | +4.59% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.91% | -7.29% | +0.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.19% | -9.87% | -7.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.91% | 3.79% | -0.88% |
Volatility
FIVLX vs. FASPX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity International Value Fund (FIVLX) has a higher volatility of 7.52% compared to Fidelity Advisor Value Strategies Fund Class M (FASPX) at 6.16%. This indicates that FIVLX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FASPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FIVLX | FASPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.52% | 6.16% | +1.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.91% | 12.82% | -1.91% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.44% | 22.61% | -5.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.47% | 20.66% | -4.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.87% | 21.98% | -4.11% |