FIVLX vs. ICOW

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FIVLX (Fidelity International Value Fund) and ICOW (Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, FIVLX returned 12.30%/yr vs 10.06%/yr for ICOW. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FIVLX charges 1.01%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for ICOW.

Performance

FIVLX vs. ICOW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity International Value Fund (FIVLX) and Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 ETF (ICOW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FIVLX achieves a 7.08% return, which is significantly lower than ICOW's 17.35% return.

FIVLX

• 1D: 0.33%
• 1M: 2.86%
• YTD: 7.08%
• 6M: 11.18%
• 1Y: 23.52%
• 3Y*: 21.69%
• 5Y*: 12.30%
• 10Y*: 9.41%

ICOW

• 1D: -0.64%
• 1M: 3.47%
• YTD: 17.35%
• 6M: 18.06%
• 1Y: 39.15%
• 3Y*: 20.17%
• 5Y*: 10.06%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FIVLX vs. ICOW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FIVLX Fidelity International Value Fund	7.08%	43.67%	5.33%	19.27%	-7.99%	14.89%	3.36%	18.92%	-17.17%	4.90%
ICOW Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 ETF	17.35%	36.95%	-2.59%	18.94%	-7.98%	11.52%	7.20%	17.91%	-16.09%	16.98%

Correlation

The correlation between FIVLX and ICOW is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.79
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.84
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.89
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 20, 2017	0.86

The correlation between FIVLX and ICOW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FIVLX vs. ICOW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FIVLX

FIVLX Risk / Return Rank: 31
FIVLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 30
FIVLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 28
FIVLX Omega Ratio Rank: 29
FIVLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
FIVLX Martin Ratio Rank: 36

ICOW

ICOW Risk / Return Rank: 84
ICOW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
ICOW Sortino Ratio Rank: 82
ICOW Omega Ratio Rank: 82
ICOW Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
ICOW Martin Ratio Rank: 84

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FIVLX vs. ICOW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity International Value Fund (FIVLX) and Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 ETF (ICOW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FIVLX	ICOW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.55	2.87	-1.32
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.21	3.72	-1.51
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.50	-0.22
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.17	4.91	-2.74
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.03	17.54	-9.51
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FIVLX vs. ICOW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FIVLX Sharpe Ratio is 1.55, which is lower than the ICOW Sharpe Ratio of 2.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FIVLX and ICOW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FIVLX	ICOW	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.55	2.87	-1.32
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.75	0.61	+0.14
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.53	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.22	0.55	-0.32

Drawdowns

FIVLX vs. ICOW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FIVLX drawdown since its inception was -65.21%, which is greater than ICOW's maximum drawdown of -43.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIVLX and ICOW.

Drawdown Indicators

	FIVLX	ICOW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-65.21%	-43.49%	-21.72%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.44%	-8.02%	-2.42%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.48%	-14.81%	+0.33%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-27.49%	-28.48%	+0.99%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-43.43%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.37%	-0.64%	-0.73%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-17.07%	-7.59%	-9.48%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.82%	2.24%	+0.58%

Volatility

FIVLX vs. ICOW - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity International Value Fund (FIVLX) has a higher volatility of 4.73% compared to Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 ETF (ICOW) at 4.41%. This indicates that FIVLX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ICOW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FIVLX	ICOW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.73%	4.41%	+0.32%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.82%	10.59%	+1.23%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.65%	13.73%	+0.92%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.55%	16.64%	-0.09%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.92%	18.47%	-0.55%

FIVLX vs. ICOW - Expense Ratio Comparison

FIVLX has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is higher than ICOW's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

FIVLX vs. ICOW - Dividend Comparison

FIVLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.17%, more than ICOW's 2.12% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FIVLX Fidelity International Value Fund	2.17%	2.32%	2.90%	2.06%	1.85%	4.35%	1.74%	3.54%	3.33%	0.15%	2.71%	1.44%
ICOW Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 ETF	2.12%	3.03%	4.39%	3.61%	5.26%	2.11%	2.46%	3.10%	2.61%	0.80%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FIVLX and ICOW in my portfolio?

FIVLX and ICOW have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FIVLX or ICOW?

FIVLX has higher volatility (4.73%) compared to ICOW (4.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIVLX dropped -65.21% vs ICOW's -43.49%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ICOW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.87 vs 1.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.