FITLX vs. FFRHX

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

FITLX (Fidelity U.S. Sustainability Index Fund) and FFRHX (Fidelity Floating Rate High Income Fund) are both mutual funds - FITLX is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA ESG Leaders Index, while FFRHX is a Bank Loan fund actively managed by Fidelity. FITLX is passively managed, while FFRHX is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, FITLX returned 12.48%/yr vs 5.49%/yr for FFRHX. Their 0.30 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. FITLX charges 0.11%/yr vs 0.67%/yr for FFRHX.

Performance

FITLX vs. FFRHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity U.S. Sustainability Index Fund (FITLX) and Fidelity Floating Rate High Income Fund (FFRHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FITLX achieves a 8.63% return, which is significantly higher than FFRHX's 2.14% return.

FITLX

• 1D: 2.13%
• 1M: -1.05%
• 6M: 7.02%
• YTD: 8.63%
• 1Y: 20.47%
• 3Y*: 19.14%
• 5Y*: 12.48%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 15.18%

FFRHX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.11%
• 6M: 2.01%
• YTD: 2.14%
• 1Y: 4.94%
• 3Y*: 6.51%
• 5Y*: 5.49%
• 10Y*: 4.82%
• ALL TIME*: 3.90%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FFRHX Fidelity Floating Rate High Income Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
FITLX Fidelity U.S. Sustainability Index Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

FITLX vs. FFRHX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FITLX Fidelity U.S. Sustainability Index Fund	8.63%	18.77%	23.59%	29.04%	-20.28%	31.55%	18.69%	31.54%	-3.32%	13.07%
FFRHX Fidelity Floating Rate High Income Fund	2.14%	5.47%	7.10%	12.63%	-1.55%	5.01%	1.69%	8.63%	0.10%	2.42%

Correlation

The correlation between FITLX and FFRHX is 0.27, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.27
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.30
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.32
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 9, 2017	0.30

Return for Risk

FITLX vs. FFRHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FITLX

FITLX Risk / Return Rank: 49
FITLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
FITLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
FITLX Omega Ratio Rank: 49
FITLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 42
FITLX Martin Ratio Rank: 51

FFRHX

FFRHX Risk / Return Rank: 95
FFRHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
FFRHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
FFRHX Omega Ratio Rank: 98
FFRHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
FFRHX Martin Ratio Rank: 94

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FITLX vs. FFRHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity U.S. Sustainability Index Fund (FITLX) and Fidelity Floating Rate High Income Fund (FFRHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FITLX	FFRHX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.32	2.30	-0.98
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.89	5.37	-3.47
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.81	-0.57
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.64	4.51	-2.87
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.77	14.73	-7.96

FITLX vs. FFRHX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FITLX Sharpe Ratio is 1.32, which is lower than the FFRHX Sharpe Ratio of 2.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FITLX and FFRHX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FITLX vs. FFRHX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FITLX drawdown since its inception was -34.35%, which is greater than FFRHX's maximum drawdown of -22.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FITLX and FFRHX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FITLX	FFRHX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.35%	-22.20%	-12.15%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.15%	-1.19%	-9.96%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.99%	-3.29%	-16.70%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.91%	-5.90%	-21.01%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-22.20%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.10%	-0.11%	-1.99%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.02%	-1.14%	-3.88%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.69%	0.36%	+2.33%

Volatility

FITLX vs. FFRHX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity U.S. Sustainability Index Fund (FITLX) has a higher volatility of 3.84% compared to Fidelity Floating Rate High Income Fund (FFRHX) at 0.22%. This indicates that FITLX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FFRHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FITLX	FFRHX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.84%	0.22%	+3.62%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.03%	1.69%	+9.34%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.83%	2.34%	+11.49%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.73%	2.89%	+14.84%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.05%	4.13%	+14.92%

FITLX vs. FFRHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FITLX has a 0.11% expense ratio, which is lower than FFRHX's 0.67% expense ratio.

Dividends

FITLX vs. FFRHX - Dividend Comparison

FITLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.02%, less than FFRHX's 6.39% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FFRHX Fidelity Floating Rate High Income Fund	6.39%	7.41%	6.94%	8.24%	3.81%	2.74%	3.84%	5.15%	4.74%	4.05%	4.44%	3.69%
FITLX Fidelity U.S. Sustainability Index Fund	1.02%	1.11%	1.29%	1.12%	1.49%	0.99%	1.01%	1.41%	1.58%	0.76%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FITLX and FFRHX in my portfolio?

FITLX and FFRHX have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FITLX or FFRHX?

FITLX has higher volatility (3.84%) compared to FFRHX (0.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FITLX dropped -34.35% vs FFRHX's -22.20%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FFRHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.30 vs 1.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.