FITHX vs. JRLVX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2035 Fund Class I (FITHX) and John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2045 Lifetime Portfolio (JRLVX).
FITHX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Nov 6, 2003. JRLVX is managed by John Hancock. It was launched on Nov 6, 2013.
Performance
FITHX vs. JRLVX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FITHX vs. JRLVX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FITHX Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2035 Fund Class I | -0.54% | 18.71% | 10.76% | 16.65% | -17.53% | 13.97% | 16.48% | 25.76% | -7.76% | 20.10% |
JRLVX John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2045 Lifetime Portfolio | -3.42% | 19.25% | 14.50% | 18.00% | -18.06% | 18.45% | 16.23% | 25.03% | -8.29% | 17.40% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FITHX achieves a -0.54% return, which is significantly higher than JRLVX's -3.42% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FITHX having a 9.70% annualized return and JRLVX not far ahead at 9.91%.
FITHX
- 1D
- 2.23%
- 1M
- -4.68%
- YTD
- -0.54%
- 6M
- 1.76%
- 1Y
- 16.22%
- 3Y*
- 12.94%
- 5Y*
- 6.30%
- 10Y*
- 9.70%
JRLVX
- 1D
- -0.25%
- 1M
- -8.07%
- YTD
- -3.42%
- 6M
- -0.73%
- 1Y
- 16.15%
- 3Y*
- 13.74%
- 5Y*
- 7.47%
- 10Y*
- 9.91%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FITHX vs. JRLVX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FITHX has a 0.71% expense ratio, which is higher than JRLVX's 0.01% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FITHX vs. JRLVX — Risk / Return Rank
FITHX
JRLVX
FITHX vs. JRLVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2035 Fund Class I (FITHX) and John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2045 Lifetime Portfolio (JRLVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FITHX | JRLVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.39 | 1.07 | +0.32 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.98 | 1.57 | +0.41 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.23 | +0.06 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.91 | 1.30 | +0.61 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.29 | 6.28 | +2.02 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FITHX | JRLVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.39 | 1.07 | +0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.51 | 0.51 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.71 | 0.62 | +0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | 0.57 | -0.12 |
Correlation
The correlation between FITHX and JRLVX is 0.98, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FITHX vs. JRLVX - Dividend Comparison
FITHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.32%, more than JRLVX's 3.68% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FITHX Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2035 Fund Class I | 7.32% | 7.28% | 1.92% | 1.51% | 9.95% | 9.48% | 6.16% | 7.35% | 11.94% | 4.16% | 4.86% | 5.38% |
JRLVX John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2045 Lifetime Portfolio | 3.68% | 3.55% | 1.89% | 2.24% | 8.03% | 6.00% | 4.26% | 8.99% | 10.96% | 4.29% | 3.40% | 1.90% |
Drawdowns
FITHX vs. JRLVX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FITHX drawdown since its inception was -54.57%, which is greater than JRLVX's maximum drawdown of -32.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FITHX and JRLVX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FITHX | JRLVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.57% | -32.53% | -22.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.72% | -11.23% | +2.51% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.91% | -25.64% | -0.27% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -29.21% | -32.53% | +3.32% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.50% | -8.50% | +3.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.12% | -4.61% | -2.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.01% | 2.33% | -0.32% |
Volatility
FITHX vs. JRLVX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2035 Fund Class I (FITHX) has a higher volatility of 5.05% compared to John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2045 Lifetime Portfolio (JRLVX) at 4.70%. This indicates that FITHX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JRLVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FITHX | JRLVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.05% | 4.70% | +0.35% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.38% | 8.47% | -1.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.09% | 15.32% | -3.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.33% | 14.69% | -2.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.63% | 15.94% | -2.31% |