PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FITHX vs. FRQHX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FITHX vs. FRQHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2035 Fund Class I (FITHX) and Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class K6 (FRQHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FITHX achieves a 9.21% return, which is significantly higher than FRQHX's 4.14% return.


FITHX

1D
0.40%
1M
3.47%
YTD
9.21%
6M
10.29%
1Y
21.75%
3Y*
15.83%
5Y*
7.43%
10Y*
10.43%

FRQHX

1D
0.21%
1M
1.55%
YTD
4.14%
6M
4.39%
1Y
10.64%
3Y*
7.87%
5Y*
3.09%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FITHX vs. FRQHX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
FITHX
Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2035 Fund Class I
9.21%18.71%10.76%16.65%-17.53%13.97%16.48%8.91%
FRQHX
Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class K6
4.14%10.01%4.68%8.75%-12.22%4.04%9.80%3.95%

Correlation

The correlation between FITHX and FRQHX is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.85

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 2, 2019

0.84

The correlation between FITHX and FRQHX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FITHX vs. FRQHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FITHX
FITHX Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
FITHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FITHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
FITHX Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
FITHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
FITHX Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

FRQHX
FRQHX Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
FRQHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FRQHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
FRQHX Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
FRQHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
FRQHX Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FITHX vs. FRQHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2035 Fund Class I (FITHX) and Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class K6 (FRQHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FITHXFRQHXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.28

2.60

-0.32

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.22

3.84

-0.62

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.52

-0.08

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.91

3.16

-0.25

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

12.52

13.43

-0.90

FITHX vs. FRQHX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FITHX Sharpe Ratio is 2.28, which is comparable to the FRQHX Sharpe Ratio of 2.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FITHX and FRQHX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FITHXFRQHXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.28

2.60

-0.32

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

0.56

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.77

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.47

0.80

-0.33

Drawdowns

FITHX vs. FRQHX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FITHX drawdown since its inception was -54.57%, which is greater than FRQHX's maximum drawdown of -16.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FITHX and FRQHX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FITHXFRQHXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.57%

-16.90%

-37.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.56%

-3.41%

-4.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.37%

-5.15%

-6.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.91%

-16.90%

-9.01%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-29.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.08%

-3.79%

-3.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.75%

0.80%

+0.95%

Volatility

FITHX vs. FRQHX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2035 Fund Class I (FITHX) has a higher volatility of 3.44% compared to Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class K6 (FRQHX) at 1.66%. This indicates that FITHX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FRQHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FITHXFRQHXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.44%

1.66%

+1.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.01%

3.41%

+4.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.64%

4.14%

+5.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.38%

5.56%

+6.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.65%

5.76%

+7.89%

FITHX vs. FRQHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FITHX has a 0.71% expense ratio, which is higher than FRQHX's 0.26% expense ratio.


Dividends

FITHX vs. FRQHX - Dividend Comparison

FITHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.23%, more than FRQHX's 3.29% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FITHX
Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2035 Fund Class I
7.23%7.28%1.92%1.51%9.95%9.48%6.16%7.35%11.94%4.16%4.86%5.38%
FRQHX
Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class K6
3.29%3.20%3.20%2.95%5.25%6.22%3.70%2.57%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FITHX and FRQHX have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FITHX has higher volatility (3.44%) compared to FRQHX (1.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FITHX dropped -54.57% vs FRQHX's -16.90%.

FRQHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.60 vs 2.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FITHX and FRQHX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer