FITGX vs. QFVOX

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

FITGX (Fidelity Advisor International Growth Fund Class M) and QFVOX (Pear Tree Polaris Foreign Value Fund) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, FITGX returned 8.72%/yr vs 9.81%/yr for QFVOX. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FITGX charges 1.55%/yr vs 1.40%/yr for QFVOX.

Performance

FITGX vs. QFVOX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor International Growth Fund Class M (FITGX) and Pear Tree Polaris Foreign Value Fund (QFVOX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FITGX achieves a 6.59% return, which is significantly lower than QFVOX's 19.17% return. Over the past 10 years, FITGX has underperformed QFVOX with an annualized return of 8.72%, while QFVOX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.81% annualized return.

FITGX

• 1D: -0.34%
• 1M: 0.93%
• YTD: 6.59%
• 6M: 7.49%
• 1Y: 12.75%
• 3Y*: 11.78%
• 5Y*: 4.88%
• 10Y*: 8.72%

QFVOX

• 1D: -0.24%
• 1M: 4.66%
• YTD: 19.17%
• 6M: 23.65%
• 1Y: 37.95%
• 3Y*: 20.72%
• 5Y*: 10.33%
• 10Y*: 9.81%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FITGX vs. QFVOX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FITGX Fidelity Advisor International Growth Fund Class M	6.59%	17.28%	4.72%	20.18%	-23.61%	14.76%	16.31%	33.19%	-12.05%	28.83%
QFVOX Pear Tree Polaris Foreign Value Fund	19.17%	33.85%	-0.70%	19.88%	-17.14%	19.44%	2.65%	17.93%	-13.28%	25.24%

Correlation

The correlation between FITGX and QFVOX is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.41
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.52
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.61
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.63
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 2007	0.68

Over the past year, the correlation between FITGX and QFVOX has dropped to 0.41 - well below their long-term average of 0.68, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

FITGX vs. QFVOX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FITGX

FITGX Risk / Return Rank: 11
FITGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 10
FITGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 10
FITGX Omega Ratio Rank: 10
FITGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
FITGX Martin Ratio Rank: 13

QFVOX

QFVOX Risk / Return Rank: 78
QFVOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
QFVOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
QFVOX Omega Ratio Rank: 79
QFVOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
QFVOX Martin Ratio Rank: 67

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FITGX vs. QFVOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor International Growth Fund Class M (FITGX) and Pear Tree Polaris Foreign Value Fund (QFVOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FITGX	QFVOX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.74	2.72	-1.98
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.18	3.77	-2.59
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.14	1.52	-0.37
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.97	3.62	-2.66
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.55	12.77	-9.22
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FITGX vs. QFVOX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FITGX Sharpe Ratio is 0.74, which is lower than the QFVOX Sharpe Ratio of 2.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FITGX and QFVOX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FITGX	QFVOX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.74	2.72	-1.98
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.27	0.67	-0.40
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.49	0.59	-0.09
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.27	0.40	-0.12

Drawdowns

FITGX vs. QFVOX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FITGX drawdown since its inception was -56.26%, smaller than the maximum QFVOX drawdown of -70.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FITGX and QFVOX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FITGX	QFVOX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-56.26%	-70.51%	+14.25%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.99%	-11.02%	-2.97%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.56%	-14.92%	-1.64%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-35.26%	-32.90%	-2.36%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-35.26%	-45.52%	+10.26%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.54%	-0.24%	-2.30%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.82%	-15.30%	+4.48%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.80%	3.11%	+0.69%

Volatility

FITGX vs. QFVOX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor International Growth Fund Class M (FITGX) has a higher volatility of 7.14% compared to Pear Tree Polaris Foreign Value Fund (QFVOX) at 4.87%. This indicates that FITGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QFVOX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FITGX	QFVOX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.14%	4.87%	+2.27%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.87%	12.53%	+3.34%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.26%	14.69%	+3.57%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.06%	15.49%	+2.57%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.82%	16.82%	+1.00%

FITGX vs. QFVOX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FITGX has a 1.55% expense ratio, which is higher than QFVOX's 1.40% expense ratio.

Dividends

FITGX vs. QFVOX - Dividend Comparison

FITGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.79%, less than QFVOX's 4.75% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FITGX Fidelity Advisor International Growth Fund Class M	2.79%	2.98%	0.74%	0.00%	1.47%	1.52%	0.00%	0.42%	0.27%	0.12%	0.66%	0.16%
QFVOX Pear Tree Polaris Foreign Value Fund	4.75%	5.66%	1.95%	1.88%	1.43%	10.11%	1.58%	1.14%	0.98%	0.60%	1.02%	1.58%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FITGX and QFVOX in my portfolio?

FITGX and QFVOX have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FITGX or QFVOX?

FITGX has higher volatility (7.14%) compared to QFVOX (4.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FITGX dropped -56.26% vs QFVOX's -70.51%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QFVOX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.72 vs 0.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.