PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FITGX vs. GQJPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FITGX vs. GQJPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor International Growth Fund Class M (FITGX) and GQG Partners International Quality Dividend Income Fund (GQJPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FITGX achieves a 6.59% return, which is significantly higher than GQJPX's 5.20% return.


FITGX

1D
-0.34%
1M
0.93%
YTD
6.59%
6M
7.49%
1Y
12.75%
3Y*
11.78%
5Y*
4.88%
10Y*
8.72%

GQJPX

1D
-0.96%
1M
-2.59%
YTD
5.20%
6M
5.92%
1Y
14.29%
3Y*
16.68%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FITGX vs. GQJPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
FITGX
Fidelity Advisor International Growth Fund Class M
6.59%17.28%4.72%20.18%-23.61%5.32%
GQJPX
GQG Partners International Quality Dividend Income Fund
5.20%24.88%7.39%18.06%-10.50%1.05%

Correlation

The correlation between FITGX and GQJPX is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.55

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2021

0.67

The correlation between FITGX and GQJPX shifts across timeframes, from 0.55 (1 year) to 0.67 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FITGX vs. GQJPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FITGX
FITGX Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
FITGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FITGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
FITGX Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
FITGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
FITGX Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank

GQJPX
GQJPX Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
GQJPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GQJPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
GQJPX Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
GQJPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
GQJPX Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FITGX vs. GQJPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor International Growth Fund Class M (FITGX) and GQG Partners International Quality Dividend Income Fund (GQJPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FITGXGQJPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.68

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.80

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.26

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.97

1.70

-0.73

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.55

5.33

-1.77

FITGX vs. GQJPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FITGX Sharpe Ratio is 0.74, which is lower than the GQJPX Sharpe Ratio of 1.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FITGX and GQJPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FITGXGQJPXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.74

1.42

-0.68

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.27

0.68

-0.40

Drawdowns

FITGX vs. GQJPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FITGX drawdown since its inception was -56.26%, which is greater than GQJPX's maximum drawdown of -21.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FITGX and GQJPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FITGXGQJPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.26%

-21.83%

-34.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.99%

-8.56%

-5.43%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.56%

-9.45%

-7.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.26%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.54%

-6.10%

+3.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.82%

-5.52%

-5.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.80%

2.72%

+1.08%

Volatility

FITGX vs. GQJPX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor International Growth Fund Class M (FITGX) has a higher volatility of 7.14% compared to GQG Partners International Quality Dividend Income Fund (GQJPX) at 2.83%. This indicates that FITGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GQJPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FITGXGQJPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.14%

2.83%

+4.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.87%

8.36%

+7.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.26%

10.25%

+8.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.06%

12.96%

+5.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.82%

12.96%

+4.86%

FITGX vs. GQJPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FITGX has a 1.55% expense ratio, which is higher than GQJPX's 0.91% expense ratio.


Dividends

FITGX vs. GQJPX - Dividend Comparison

FITGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.79%, less than GQJPX's 3.95% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FITGX
Fidelity Advisor International Growth Fund Class M
2.79%2.98%0.74%0.00%1.47%1.52%0.00%0.42%0.27%0.12%0.66%0.16%
GQJPX
GQG Partners International Quality Dividend Income Fund
3.95%3.22%3.35%4.50%5.59%1.75%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FITGX and GQJPX have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FITGX has higher volatility (7.14%) compared to GQJPX (2.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FITGX dropped -56.26% vs GQJPX's -21.83%.

GQJPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.42 vs 0.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FITGX and GQJPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer