FITE vs. TRUT

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

FITE (SPDR S&P Kensho Future Security ETF) and TRUT (Vaneck Technology Trusector ETF) are both Technology Equities funds. FITE is passively managed, while TRUT is actively managed. Their 0.60 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. FITE charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.13%/yr for TRUT.

Performance

FITE vs. TRUT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P Kensho Future Security ETF (FITE) and Vaneck Technology Trusector ETF (TRUT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FITE achieves a 25.01% return, which is significantly higher than TRUT's 14.47% return.

FITE

• 1D: 1.14%
• 1M: -5.38%
• 6M: 15.88%
• YTD: 25.01%
• 1Y: 42.30%
• 3Y*: 29.02%
• 5Y*: 15.64%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 16.58%

TRUT

• 1D: -0.36%
• 1M: -0.01%
• 6M: 16.69%
• YTD: 14.47%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FITE SPDR S&P Kensho Future Security ETF	$864.27K	$865.45K	$935.71K
TRUT Vaneck Technology Trusector ETF	$14.71M	$9.45M	$6.28M

FITE vs. TRUT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
FITE SPDR S&P Kensho Future Security ETF	25.01%	10.74%
TRUT Vaneck Technology Trusector ETF	14.47%	9.76%

Correlation

The correlation between FITE and TRUT is 0.60, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 21, 2025	0.60

Return for Risk

FITE vs. TRUT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FITE

FITE Risk / Return Rank: 61
FITE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
FITE Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
FITE Omega Ratio Rank: 55
FITE Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
FITE Martin Ratio Rank: 54

TRUT

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FITE vs. TRUT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Kensho Future Security ETF (FITE) and Vaneck Technology Trusector ETF (TRUT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FITE	TRUT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.45	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.03	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.60	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.33	—	—

Drawdowns

FITE vs. TRUT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FITE drawdown since its inception was -36.90%, which is greater than TRUT's maximum drawdown of -18.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FITE and TRUT.

Drawdown Indicators

	FITE	TRUT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-36.90%	-18.55%	-18.35%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.35%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.07%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-27.14%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-10.00%	-9.98%	-0.02%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.41%	-5.74%	-1.67%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.29%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	FITE	TRUT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.58%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	22.04%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	27.53%	23.82%	+3.71%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.04%	23.82%	-0.78%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.27%	23.82%	-0.55%

FITE vs. TRUT - Expense Ratio Comparison

FITE has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than TRUT's 0.13% expense ratio.

Dividends

FITE vs. TRUT - Dividend Comparison

FITE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.13%, less than TRUT's 0.32% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
FITE SPDR S&P Kensho Future Security ETF	0.13%	0.23%	0.12%	0.13%	0.12%	0.92%	0.88%	0.44%	1.79%
TRUT Vaneck Technology Trusector ETF	0.32%	0.14%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FITE and TRUT in my portfolio?

FITE and TRUT have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, FITE or TRUT?

On fees, TRUT is cheaper at 0.13% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, FITE or TRUT?

TRUT is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for FITE.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FITE or TRUT?

TRUT has the higher dividend yield at 0.32%, compared with 0.13% for FITE.

What is the main difference between FITE and TRUT?

They also come from different issuers: State Street and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for FITE and 0.13% for TRUT.