PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FISV vs. META
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

FISV vs. META - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fiserv, Inc (FISV) and Meta Platforms, Inc. (META). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FISV achieves a -19.93% return, which is significantly lower than META's -14.03% return. Over the past 10 years, FISV has underperformed META with an annualized return of 0.17%, while META has yielded a comparatively higher 17.39% annualized return.


FISV

1D
1.36%
1M
0.60%
YTD
-19.93%
6M
-21.77%
1Y
-67.01%
3Y*
-23.21%
5Y*
-13.37%
10Y*
0.17%

META

1D
-0.26%
1M
-8.32%
YTD
-14.03%
6M
-11.84%
1Y
-16.71%
3Y*
28.18%
5Y*
11.52%
10Y*
17.39%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FISV vs. META - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FISV
Fiserv, Inc
-19.93%-67.30%54.64%31.43%-2.62%-8.84%-1.53%57.34%12.09%23.38%
META
Meta Platforms, Inc.
-14.03%13.09%66.05%194.13%-64.22%23.13%33.09%56.57%-25.71%53.38%

Correlation

The correlation between FISV and META is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.21

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.23

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.36

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 18, 2012

0.36

The correlation between FISV and META shifts across timeframes, from 0.21 (1 year) to 0.36 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

FISV:

$28.79B

META:

$1.45T

EPS

FISV:

$5.91

META:

$27.47

PE Ratio

FISV:

9.10

META:

20.64

PEG Ratio

FISV:

0.25

META:

0.85

PS Ratio

FISV:

1.38

META:

6.78

PB Ratio

FISV:

1.10

META:

5.97

Total Revenue (TTM)

FISV:

$21.09B

META:

$214.96B

Gross Profit (TTM)

FISV:

$9.52B

META:

$176.14B

EBITDA (TTM)

FISV:

$7.75B

META:

$106.31B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FISV vs. META — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FISV
FISV Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
FISV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FISV Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
FISV Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
FISV Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
FISV Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank

META
META Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
META Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
META Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
META Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
META Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
META Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FISV vs. META - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fiserv, Inc (FISV) and Meta Platforms, Inc. (META). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FISVMETADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.71

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.25

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.64

0.93

-0.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.97

-0.54

-0.43

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.29

-1.12

-0.17

FISV vs. META - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FISV Sharpe Ratio is -1.22, which is lower than the META Sharpe Ratio of -0.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FISV and META, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FISV vs. META - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FISV drawdown since its inception was -77.98%, roughly equal to the maximum META drawdown of -76.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FISV and META.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FISVMETADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-77.98%

-76.74%

-1.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-70.17%

-33.30%

-36.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-77.98%

-34.15%

-43.83%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-77.98%

-76.74%

-1.24%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-77.98%

-76.74%

-1.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-77.38%

-28.06%

-49.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.18%

-15.83%

+4.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

52.85%

16.06%

+36.79%

Volatility

FISV vs. META - Volatility Comparison

Fiserv, Inc (FISV) has a higher volatility of 11.15% compared to Meta Platforms, Inc. (META) at 10.17%. This indicates that FISV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than META based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FISVMETADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.15%

10.17%

+0.98%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

26.49%

26.91%

-0.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

55.98%

35.52%

+20.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

35.61%

44.04%

-8.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.62%

38.67%

-7.05%

Dividends

FISV vs. META - Dividend Comparison

FISV has not paid dividends to shareholders, while META's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.37%.


PositionTTM20252024
FISV
Fiserv, Inc
0.00%0.00%0.00%
META
Meta Platforms, Inc.
0.37%0.32%0.34%

Financials

FISV vs. META - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Fiserv, Inc and Meta Platforms, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0010.00B20.00B30.00B40.00B50.00B60.00B20222023202420252026
5.03B
56.31B
(FISV) Total Revenue
(META) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

FISV vs. META - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Fiserv, Inc and Meta Platforms, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%202220232024202520260
81.9%
Portfolio components
FISV - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fiserv, Inc reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 5.03B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

META - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Meta Platforms, Inc. reported a gross profit of 46.09B and revenue of 56.31B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 81.9%.

FISV - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fiserv, Inc reported an operating income of 918.00M and revenue of 5.03B, resulting in an operating margin of 18.3%.

META - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Meta Platforms, Inc. reported an operating income of 22.87B and revenue of 56.31B, resulting in an operating margin of 40.6%.

FISV - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fiserv, Inc reported a net income of 571.00M and revenue of 5.03B, resulting in a net margin of 11.4%.

META - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Meta Platforms, Inc. reported a net income of 26.77B and revenue of 56.31B, resulting in a net margin of 47.5%.


Frequently Asked Questions


FISV and META have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FISV has higher volatility (11.15%) compared to META (10.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FISV dropped -77.98% vs META's -76.74%.

META currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.51 vs -1.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FISV and META

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer