FISR vs. BNDP
FISR (SPDR SSGA Fixed Income Sector Rotation ETF) and BNDP (Vanguard Core-Plus Bond Index ETF) are both Intermediate Core-Plus Bond funds. FISR is actively managed, while BNDP is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FISR charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for BNDP.
Performance
FISR vs. BNDP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FISR achieves a -0.13% return, which is significantly lower than BNDP's 0.34% return.
FISR
- 1D
- -0.39%
- 1M
- 0.21%
- YTD
- -0.13%
- 6M
- -0.33%
- 1Y
- 4.75%
- 3Y*
- 3.27%
- 5Y*
- -0.78%
- 10Y*
- —
BNDP
- 1D
- -0.08%
- 1M
- 0.41%
- YTD
- 0.34%
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FISR vs. BNDP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FISR SPDR SSGA Fixed Income Sector Rotation ETF | -0.13% | 0.09% |
BNDP Vanguard Core-Plus Bond Index ETF | 0.34% | 0.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between FISR and BNDP is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 5, 2025 | 0.94 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FISR vs. BNDP — Risk / Return Rank
FISR
BNDP
FISR vs. BNDP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR SSGA Fixed Income Sector Rotation ETF (FISR) and Vanguard Core-Plus Bond Index ETF (BNDP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FISR | BNDP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.56 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.53 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FISR | BNDP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.09 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.12 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.12 | 0.25 | -0.12 |
Drawdowns
FISR vs. BNDP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FISR drawdown since its inception was -20.27%, which is greater than BNDP's maximum drawdown of -2.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FISR and BNDP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FISR | BNDP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.27% | -2.60% | -17.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.06% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.60% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.10% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.48% | -1.31% | -5.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.70% | -0.86% | -6.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.05% | — | — |
Volatility
FISR vs. BNDP - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FISR | BNDP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.44% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.22% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.36% | 3.63% | +0.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.59% | 3.63% | +2.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.35% | 3.63% | +2.72% |
FISR vs. BNDP - Expense Ratio Comparison
FISR has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than BNDP's 0.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
FISR vs. BNDP - Dividend Comparison
FISR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.19%, more than BNDP's 2.08% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BNDP Vanguard Core-Plus Bond Index ETF | 2.08% | 0.24% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FISR SPDR SSGA Fixed Income Sector Rotation ETF | 4.19% | 3.97% | 3.59% | 3.50% | 2.19% | 1.87% | 2.47% | 2.99% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.94, FISR and BNDP move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, BNDP is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BNDP is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for FISR.
FISR has the higher dividend yield at 4.19%, compared with 2.08% for BNDP.
They also come from different issuers: State Street and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for FISR and 0.05% for BNDP.
Find the right allocation for FISR and BNDP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer