PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FISMX vs. MGRAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FISMX vs. MGRAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity International Small Cap Fund (FISMX) and MFS International Growth Fund (MGRAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FISMX achieves a 9.34% return, which is significantly higher than MGRAX's 1.74% return. Over the past 10 years, FISMX has underperformed MGRAX with an annualized return of 9.23%, while MGRAX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.95% annualized return.


FISMX

1D
0.55%
1M
0.73%
YTD
9.34%
6M
10.06%
1Y
17.15%
3Y*
13.51%
5Y*
6.09%
10Y*
9.23%

MGRAX

1D
0.36%
1M
2.19%
YTD
1.74%
6M
1.84%
1Y
8.01%
3Y*
10.82%
5Y*
5.40%
10Y*
9.95%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FISMX vs. MGRAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FISMX
Fidelity International Small Cap Fund
9.34%24.73%0.05%19.62%-16.66%13.44%9.98%21.45%-16.08%31.58%
MGRAX
MFS International Growth Fund
1.74%20.73%8.82%14.54%-15.31%9.20%15.45%26.83%-9.09%32.15%

Correlation

The correlation between FISMX and MGRAX is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.84

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 19, 2002

0.84

The correlation between FISMX and MGRAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FISMX vs. MGRAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FISMX
FISMX Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
FISMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FISMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
FISMX Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
FISMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
FISMX Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

MGRAX
MGRAX Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
MGRAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MGRAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
MGRAX Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
MGRAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
MGRAX Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FISMX vs. MGRAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity International Small Cap Fund (FISMX) and MFS International Growth Fund (MGRAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FISMXMGRAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.79

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.09

+0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.50

0.52

+0.97

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.27

1.71

+3.56

FISMX vs. MGRAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FISMX Sharpe Ratio is 1.25, which is higher than the MGRAX Sharpe Ratio of 0.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FISMX and MGRAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FISMX vs. MGRAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FISMX drawdown since its inception was -60.94%, which is greater than MGRAX's maximum drawdown of -55.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FISMX and MGRAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FISMXMGRAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.94%

-55.29%

-5.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.71%

-12.42%

+1.71%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.70%

-13.66%

+0.96%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.07%

-30.58%

-0.49%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.80%

-30.58%

-8.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.83%

-4.93%

+3.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.63%

-10.85%

+0.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.04%

3.82%

-0.78%

Volatility

FISMX vs. MGRAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity International Small Cap Fund (FISMX) is 4.85%, while MFS International Growth Fund (MGRAX) has a volatility of 5.49%. This indicates that FISMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MGRAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FISMXMGRAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.85%

5.49%

-0.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.81%

11.60%

-0.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.78%

13.97%

-1.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.66%

15.68%

-2.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.08%

15.76%

-1.68%

FISMX vs. MGRAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FISMX has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is lower than MGRAX's 1.06% expense ratio.


Dividends

FISMX vs. MGRAX - Dividend Comparison

FISMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.28%, less than MGRAX's 5.26% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FISMX
Fidelity International Small Cap Fund
3.28%3.58%2.64%1.87%0.70%7.28%0.83%2.32%6.14%2.46%2.70%2.80%
MGRAX
MFS International Growth Fund
5.26%5.35%5.99%2.56%2.69%6.62%0.56%1.42%3.82%2.26%1.01%1.06%

Frequently Asked Questions


FISMX and MGRAX have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MGRAX has higher volatility (5.49%) compared to FISMX (4.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FISMX dropped -60.94% vs MGRAX's -55.29%.

FISMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.25 vs 0.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FISMX and MGRAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer