FISMX vs. MGRAX
FISMX (Fidelity International Small Cap Fund) and MGRAX (MFS International Growth Fund) are both mutual funds - FISMX is a Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities fund managed by Fidelity, while MGRAX is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund managed by MFS. Over the past 10 years, FISMX returned 9.23%/yr vs 9.95%/yr for MGRAX. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FISMX charges 1.01%/yr vs 1.06%/yr for MGRAX.
Performance
FISMX vs. MGRAX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FISMX achieves a 9.34% return, which is significantly higher than MGRAX's 1.74% return. Over the past 10 years, FISMX has underperformed MGRAX with an annualized return of 9.23%, while MGRAX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.95% annualized return.
FISMX
- 1D
- 0.55%
- 1M
- 0.73%
- YTD
- 9.34%
- 6M
- 10.06%
- 1Y
- 17.15%
- 3Y*
- 13.51%
- 5Y*
- 6.09%
- 10Y*
- 9.23%
MGRAX
- 1D
- 0.36%
- 1M
- 2.19%
- YTD
- 1.74%
- 6M
- 1.84%
- 1Y
- 8.01%
- 3Y*
- 10.82%
- 5Y*
- 5.40%
- 10Y*
- 9.95%
FISMX vs. MGRAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FISMX Fidelity International Small Cap Fund | 9.34% | 24.73% | 0.05% | 19.62% | -16.66% | 13.44% | 9.98% | 21.45% | -16.08% | 31.58% |
MGRAX MFS International Growth Fund | 1.74% | 20.73% | 8.82% | 14.54% | -15.31% | 9.20% | 15.45% | 26.83% | -9.09% | 32.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between FISMX and MGRAX is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 19, 2002 | 0.84 |
The correlation between FISMX and MGRAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FISMX vs. MGRAX — Risk / Return Rank
FISMX
MGRAX
FISMX vs. MGRAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity International Small Cap Fund (FISMX) and MFS International Growth Fund (MGRAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FISMX | MGRAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.79 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.10 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.09 | +0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.50 | 0.52 | +0.97 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.27 | 1.71 | +3.56 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FISMX vs. MGRAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FISMX drawdown since its inception was -60.94%, which is greater than MGRAX's maximum drawdown of -55.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FISMX and MGRAX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FISMX | MGRAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.94% | -55.29% | -5.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.71% | -12.42% | +1.71% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.70% | -13.66% | +0.96% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.07% | -30.58% | -0.49% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.80% | -30.58% | -8.22% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.83% | -4.93% | +3.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.63% | -10.85% | +0.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.04% | 3.82% | -0.78% |
Volatility
FISMX vs. MGRAX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity International Small Cap Fund (FISMX) is 4.85%, while MFS International Growth Fund (MGRAX) has a volatility of 5.49%. This indicates that FISMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MGRAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FISMX | MGRAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.85% | 5.49% | -0.64% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.81% | 11.60% | -0.79% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.78% | 13.97% | -1.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.66% | 15.68% | -2.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.08% | 15.76% | -1.68% |
FISMX vs. MGRAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FISMX has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is lower than MGRAX's 1.06% expense ratio.
Dividends
FISMX vs. MGRAX - Dividend Comparison
FISMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.28%, less than MGRAX's 5.26% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FISMX Fidelity International Small Cap Fund | 3.28% | 3.58% | 2.64% | 1.87% | 0.70% | 7.28% | 0.83% | 2.32% | 6.14% | 2.46% | 2.70% | 2.80% |
MGRAX MFS International Growth Fund | 5.26% | 5.35% | 5.99% | 2.56% | 2.69% | 6.62% | 0.56% | 1.42% | 3.82% | 2.26% | 1.01% | 1.06% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FISMX and MGRAX have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MGRAX has higher volatility (5.49%) compared to FISMX (4.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FISMX dropped -60.94% vs MGRAX's -55.29%.
FISMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.25 vs 0.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FISMX and MGRAX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer