FISGX vs. QQQX
Compare and contrast key facts about Nuveen Mid Cap Growth Opportunities Fund (FISGX) and Nuveen NASDAQ 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund (QQQX).
FISGX is managed by Nuveen. It was launched on Dec 28, 1989. QQQX is a passively managed fund by Nuveen that tracks the performance of the Nasdaq 100 Index. It was launched on Jan 30, 2007.
Performance
FISGX vs. QQQX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FISGX vs. QQQX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FISGX Nuveen Mid Cap Growth Opportunities Fund | -1.09% | 7.83% | 13.65% | 20.26% | -30.11% | 5.01% | 46.58% | 66.58% | -9.33% | 24.98% |
QQQX Nuveen NASDAQ 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund | -0.51% | 14.87% | 25.61% | 21.68% | -27.39% | 25.32% | 15.75% | 28.83% | -11.68% | 39.19% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FISGX achieves a -1.09% return, which is significantly lower than QQQX's -0.51% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FISGX having a 12.11% annualized return and QQQX not far behind at 11.87%.
FISGX
- 1D
- 4.20%
- 1M
- -6.88%
- YTD
- -1.09%
- 6M
- 1.26%
- 1Y
- 20.30%
- 3Y*
- 10.00%
- 5Y*
- 1.33%
- 10Y*
- 12.11%
QQQX
- 1D
- 4.05%
- 1M
- 1.77%
- YTD
- -0.51%
- 6M
- 4.98%
- 1Y
- 26.55%
- 3Y*
- 13.53%
- 5Y*
- 8.16%
- 10Y*
- 11.87%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FISGX vs. QQQX - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both FISGX and QQQX have an expense ratio of 0.92%.
Return for Risk
FISGX vs. QQQX — Risk / Return Rank
FISGX
QQQX
FISGX vs. QQQX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen Mid Cap Growth Opportunities Fund (FISGX) and Nuveen NASDAQ 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund (QQQX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FISGX | QQQX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.89 | 1.26 | -0.37 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.41 | 1.87 | -0.46 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.29 | -0.11 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.34 | 2.10 | -0.76 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.16 | 10.38 | -5.22 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FISGX | QQQX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.89 | 1.26 | -0.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.06 | 0.41 | -0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.51 | 0.57 | -0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.49 | 0.46 | +0.04 |
Correlation
The correlation between FISGX and QQQX is 0.70, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
FISGX vs. QQQX - Dividend Comparison
FISGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.44%, more than QQQX's 8.27% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FISGX Nuveen Mid Cap Growth Opportunities Fund | 8.44% | 8.35% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 23.94% | 9.97% | 38.61% | 19.12% | 17.17% | 4.01% | 7.82% |
QQQX Nuveen NASDAQ 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund | 8.27% | 7.85% | 6.73% | 7.26% | 9.66% | 5.85% | 6.00% | 6.49% | 8.40% | 5.95% | 7.54% | 7.23% |
Drawdowns
FISGX vs. QQQX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FISGX drawdown since its inception was -57.51%, roughly equal to the maximum QQQX drawdown of -57.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FISGX and QQQX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FISGX | QQQX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.51% | -57.25% | -0.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.30% | -12.93% | -0.37% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.30% | -29.33% | -13.97% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.30% | -35.96% | -7.34% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.90% | -0.86% | -7.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.89% | -8.09% | -1.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.45% | 2.61% | +0.84% |
Volatility
FISGX vs. QQQX - Volatility Comparison
Nuveen Mid Cap Growth Opportunities Fund (FISGX) has a higher volatility of 8.56% compared to Nuveen NASDAQ 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund (QQQX) at 8.15%. This indicates that FISGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FISGX | QQQX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.56% | 8.15% | +0.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.00% | 11.99% | +3.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.73% | 21.13% | +2.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.36% | 19.80% | +3.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.89% | 21.05% | +2.84% |