FISGX vs. NEEGX
FISGX (Nuveen Mid Cap Growth Opportunities Fund) and NEEGX (Needham Growth Fund) are both Mid Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, FISGX returned 12.26%/yr vs 14.06%/yr for NEEGX. Their correlation of 0.84 means they have usually moved in the same direction. FISGX charges 0.92%/yr vs 1.78%/yr for NEEGX.
Performance
FISGX vs. NEEGX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FISGX achieves a 7.45% return, which is significantly lower than NEEGX's 34.50% return. Over the past 10 years, FISGX has underperformed NEEGX with an annualized return of 12.26%, while NEEGX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.06% annualized return.
FISGX
- 1D
- 2.72%
- 1M
- -7.17%
- 6M
- 4.03%
- YTD
- 7.45%
- 1Y
- 14.67%
- 3Y*
- 10.61%
- 5Y*
- 1.32%
- 10Y*
- 12.26%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.74%
NEEGX
- 1D
- 5.86%
- 1M
- -10.02%
- 6M
- 17.12%
- YTD
- 34.50%
- 1Y
- 51.33%
- 3Y*
- 16.90%
- 5Y*
- 8.81%
- 10Y*
- 14.06%
- ALL TIME*
- 12.59%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
NEEGX Needham Growth Fund | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
FISGX vs. NEEGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FISGX Nuveen Mid Cap Growth Opportunities Fund | 7.45% | 7.83% | 13.65% | 20.26% | -30.11% | 5.01% | 46.58% | 66.58% | -9.33% | 24.98% |
NEEGX Needham Growth Fund | 34.50% | 8.76% | 14.45% | 26.85% | -33.57% | 27.63% | 41.73% | 42.33% | -10.56% | 8.33% |
Correlation
The correlation between FISGX and NEEGX is 0.85, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.85 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.81 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.84 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.85 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 26, 1995 | 0.84 |
The correlation between FISGX and NEEGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FISGX vs. NEEGX — Risk / Return Rank
FISGX
NEEGX
FISGX vs. NEEGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen Mid Cap Growth Opportunities Fund (FISGX) and Needham Growth Fund (NEEGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FISGX | NEEGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.82 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.94 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.24 | -0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.02 | 2.00 | -0.97 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.37 | 8.32 | -4.95 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FISGX vs. NEEGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FISGX drawdown since its inception was -57.51%, which is greater than NEEGX's maximum drawdown of -53.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FISGX and NEEGX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FISGX | NEEGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.51% | -53.60% | -3.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.33% | -23.15% | +10.82% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.16% | -38.66% | +10.50% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.30% | -43.35% | +0.05% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.30% | -43.35% | +0.05% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.94% | -18.65% | +8.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.83% | -10.88% | +1.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.73% | 5.68% | -1.95% |
Volatility
FISGX vs. NEEGX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Nuveen Mid Cap Growth Opportunities Fund (FISGX) is 6.49%, while Needham Growth Fund (NEEGX) has a volatility of 12.98%. This indicates that FISGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NEEGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FISGX | NEEGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.49% | 12.98% | -6.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.03% | 26.85% | -9.82% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.11% | 32.47% | -11.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.76% | 29.42% | -5.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.10% | 25.90% | -1.80% |
FISGX vs. NEEGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FISGX has a 0.92% expense ratio, which is lower than NEEGX's 1.78% expense ratio.
Dividends
FISGX vs. NEEGX - Dividend Comparison
FISGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.77%, more than NEEGX's 5.63% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FISGX Nuveen Mid Cap Growth Opportunities Fund | 7.77% | 8.35% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 23.94% | 9.97% | 38.61% | 19.12% | 17.17% | 4.01% | 7.82% |
NEEGX Needham Growth Fund | 5.63% | 7.57% | 3.92% | 0.00% | 1.78% | 6.92% | 5.73% | 11.31% | 17.79% | 9.70% | 4.22% | 6.74% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FISGX and NEEGX have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NEEGX has higher volatility (12.98%) compared to FISGX (6.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FISGX dropped -57.51% vs NEEGX's -53.60%.
NEEGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.42 vs 0.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FISGX and NEEGX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer