PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FISCX vs. SHRAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FISCX vs. SHRAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Convertible Securities Fund (FISCX) and ClearBridge Aggressive Growth Fund (SHRAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FISCX achieves a 11.36% return, which is significantly higher than SHRAX's 3.89% return. Over the past 10 years, FISCX has outperformed SHRAX with an annualized return of 12.37%, while SHRAX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.07% annualized return.


FISCX

1D
0.92%
1M
5.98%
YTD
11.36%
6M
11.31%
1Y
25.06%
3Y*
16.62%
5Y*
4.76%
10Y*
12.37%

SHRAX

1D
-0.22%
1M
7.01%
YTD
3.89%
6M
2.12%
1Y
11.37%
3Y*
14.27%
5Y*
3.99%
10Y*
8.07%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FISCX vs. SHRAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FISCX
Franklin Convertible Securities Fund
11.36%13.63%16.62%9.96%-15.95%-5.70%46.28%33.99%4.15%17.98%
SHRAX
ClearBridge Aggressive Growth Fund
3.89%13.50%12.02%24.09%-25.43%7.35%19.74%24.26%-7.93%14.22%

Correlation

The correlation between FISCX and SHRAX is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.83

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 1990

0.80

The correlation between FISCX and SHRAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FISCX vs. SHRAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FISCX
FISCX Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
FISCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FISCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
FISCX Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
FISCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
FISCX Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

SHRAX
SHRAX Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
SHRAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SHRAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
SHRAX Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
SHRAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
SHRAX Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FISCX vs. SHRAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Convertible Securities Fund (FISCX) and ClearBridge Aggressive Growth Fund (SHRAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FISCXSHRAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.71

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.25

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.14

+0.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.03

0.87

+3.16

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.49

2.46

+14.02

FISCX vs. SHRAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FISCX Sharpe Ratio is 2.46, which is higher than the SHRAX Sharpe Ratio of 0.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FISCX and SHRAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FISCXSHRAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.46

0.75

+1.71

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

0.19

+0.19

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.92

0.39

+0.53

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.81

0.46

+0.35

Drawdowns

FISCX vs. SHRAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FISCX drawdown since its inception was -49.16%, smaller than the maximum SHRAX drawdown of -57.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FISCX and SHRAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FISCXSHRAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.16%

-57.26%

+8.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.38%

-14.59%

+8.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.95%

-23.73%

+10.78%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.37%

-33.77%

-0.60%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.37%

-33.77%

-0.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.17%

+1.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.91%

-11.27%

+4.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.56%

5.17%

-3.61%

Volatility

FISCX vs. SHRAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franklin Convertible Securities Fund (FISCX) is 2.88%, while ClearBridge Aggressive Growth Fund (SHRAX) has a volatility of 4.07%. This indicates that FISCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SHRAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FISCXSHRAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.88%

4.07%

-1.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.47%

13.16%

-4.69%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.45%

17.13%

-6.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.40%

20.90%

-8.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.48%

20.89%

-7.41%

FISCX vs. SHRAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FISCX has a 0.83% expense ratio, which is lower than SHRAX's 1.11% expense ratio.


Dividends

FISCX vs. SHRAX - Dividend Comparison

FISCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.89%, less than SHRAX's 21.44% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FISCX
Franklin Convertible Securities Fund
8.89%9.94%4.87%2.22%8.70%8.10%11.30%16.05%7.09%7.68%4.62%4.68%
SHRAX
ClearBridge Aggressive Growth Fund
21.44%22.27%20.39%13.77%15.63%26.11%18.42%12.71%18.97%5.97%4.76%4.03%

Frequently Asked Questions


FISCX and SHRAX have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SHRAX has higher volatility (4.07%) compared to FISCX (2.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FISCX dropped -49.16% vs SHRAX's -57.26%.

FISCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.46 vs 0.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FISCX and SHRAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer